User talk:Kartikm77

October 2022
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 21:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 21:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am not sure why I am blocked. I have given many relevant contributions to this page and few other pages also. You can check all my contribution given
 * The external link provided was also for the same topic with more detail information on Windows server 2022. Why it is been considered to be advertising? Was this link being not relevant to the topic?
 * Request you to keep the link and unblock my id
 * Regards
 * Kartik Mehta Kartikm77 (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You were linking your own blog. Drmies (talk) 21:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Drmies,
 * Thanks for the quick reply. I have provided many other links in reference section, which were of not my site.
 * My intention, when I provide any article as a reference or external link is to provide the right content to the reader.
 * Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Drimes,
 * I disagree with MrOllie See below what is mentioned in the External link article guidelines. Was not I am abiding it,
 * "Some acceptable external links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy."
 * Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 22:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:ELNO is clear. You should not be linking to your blog. MrOllie (talk) 22:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi MrOllie
 * It says "Links normally to be avoided" it does not say "It is not allowed"
 * When you make a decision, it should not on one point, but you should see what are other points the article is actually fulfilling
 * Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The fact that you're blocked should be a strong hint that you are misinterpreting the policy. I assure you, adding links to your blog (really, any blog) is not allowed. MrOllie (talk) 22:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry abiding seems to be wrong word. Please read "fulfilling" instead of it Kartikm77 (talk) 22:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Drimes,
 * I see MrOille mention is wrong and seems to be intentional. He is referring to the section which says, "Links normally to be avoided" it does not say "It is not allowed"
 * And I believe When you make a decision, it should not on one point, but you should see what are other points the article is actually fulfilling.
 * I leave it to Wikipedia now, but this has really demotivated me who was really wanted to contribute to Wikipedia
 * Thanks and Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 22:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Demies, Could you please help to unblock my ID. I have already accepted and understood my mistake and also apologies for the same. It seems its stuck because I have two request for unblock and I do not know how to close one. Please help
 * Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 19:56, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear Drmies, All administrator
 * Could you please remove me from Active block "Category:Requests for unblock" as it is showing in the Google search its creating wrong impression of me please.
 * Please unblock my ID or let me know anything from the process missing from my side. I am happy to follow it.
 * Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

{unblock|reason=YHi Team,

I apologies if I have not followed your rule. Please unblock my ID

Just a request please correct the rule as it says "Links normally to be avoided" if adding your own blog link though it is relevant to topic and adding value is against rule, that result in permanent disable of User ID then your instruction should say ""It is not allowed" to avoid any confusion. My bad please read Indefinately blocked instead of Permanently blocked

Regards

Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 07:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)} I've fixed the formatting of your request; your request should be placed in the large edit window, not the smaller section header/edit summary window, and your initial statement should replace the words "Your reason here". 331dot (talk) 08:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your account ("ID") is not "permanently disabled". You are blocked until you demonstrate your understanding of the reasons for the block. You are saying that the policy is the problem and not your actions- this is not likely to be successful. Every blogger thinks that their blog would "add value"(which is marketing speak) and you haven't said why yours would be an exception to the policy. That's leaving aside conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 08:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks 331dot,
 * This page need the content for all the new features of Windows server 2022. I have added the some of the security features. I have detailed explanation of all of the features of Windows server 2022 in my article. I had 2 options either I copy paste all of it from my blog to this Wikipedia article or give reference to my article. If I copy paste it will be the duplication of content which is not good what I feel hence I opted for second option to provide the link to my article. Hope this clarifies my side. I am not saying I am right but this what I felt. Please correct were I got wrong and I really apologies for the mistake Kartikm77 (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks 331dot,

This page need the content for all the new features of Windows server 2022. I have added the some of the security features. I have detailed explanation of all of the features of Windows server 2022 in my article. I had 2 options either I copy paste all of it from my blog to this Wikipedia article or give reference to my article. If I copy paste it will be the duplication of content which is not good what I feel hence I opted for second option to provide the link to my article. Hope this clarifies my side. I am not saying I am right but this what I felt. Please correct were I got wrong and I really apologies for the mistake. I have given my reply by Edit source because it was blocking me to give reply. But after pasting in edit source I was also able to reply so I have replied the same in the reply to 331dot.

This page need the content for all the new features of Windows server 2022. I have added the some of the security features. I have detailed explanation of all of the features of Windows server 2022 in my article. I had 2 options either I copy paste all of it from my blog to this Wikipedia article or give reference to my article. If I copy paste it will be the duplication of content which is not good what I feel hence I opted for second option to provide the link to my article. Hope this clarifies my side. I am not saying I am right but this what I felt. Please correct were I got wrong and I really apologies for the mistake. Kartikm77 (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Dear Team,

Good Day! Please no hard feeling I am trying to convey my side.

I am not sure what to say. t seems to me the administrator is not reading and not acknowledging the reason I have given why I have posted my link.

One side they ask me to provide my reason for doing it and other side they decline saying you have not accepted the mistake.

Also the review comment is confusing to me

For example, I said in my above reply "If I copy paste it will be the duplication of content which is not good what I feel hence I opted for second option to provide the link to my article."

But in the review comment Yamla saying " it would have been inappropriate to copy-and-paste" I did not get it, I am saying the same thing in my reply

Then I said in above reply " I am not saying I am right but this what I felt. Please correct were I got wrong and I really apologies for the mistake"

So after giving my reasoning why I pasted my blog link which administrator only ask me to provide I also apologies for the mistake so what else is expected?

Once again, I am apologizing for my mistake as I got it that copy pasting your own blog link for any reason it may be is not allowed by the wiki rule and it is considered SPAM

Regards

Kartik

Kartikm77 (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You're not the first user to try the old "make a series of edits with good sources, then sneak in links to my own website/articles" strategy. It's pretty clear that your main purpose in creating an account was to promote yourself. Lengthy wikilawyering is not helping. The only way you're going to get unblocked is if you explicitly agree to not post links to your own sites/blogs. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 20:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok I agree to not post links to my own sites/blogs. Infect I have already apologies earlier for the mistake that means the same Kartikm77 (talk) 06:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You have two open requests; only one is needed. Please remove the one you don't want reviewed. Please also place your edits in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header/edit summary window.  Your statement should replace the words "your reason here" in your request.  You should click "edit" and not "new section" to edit this page and avoid creating section headers.  This may be easier to do in full desktop mode even on a device, scroll to the bottom in a browser and click "desktop". 331dot (talk) 06:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi 331dot,
 * Thanks for your guidance, I am very new to Wikipedia so unaware of all the process. Do you mean I have to use Edit Source option and paste my reply? I am getting Edit source option not Edit for this page please guide
 * Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 06:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with the Visual Editor as I am used to the source editor(I find the visual editor clunky but many like it), but you shouldn't have to use the source editor. The important thing is that your actual request is not placed in the section header and that your initial statement replaces the words "your reason here". 331dot (talk) 06:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear 331 dot,
 * Request your help, I do not know how to delete one of the 2 requests. I may do some mistake in trying. Could you please help to delete one or consider one. You may consider second one with latest update.
 * Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 06:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It seems by mistake I have created the third request. Please consider second request which have latest update and were I have apologies and accepted my mistake. Kartikm77 (talk) 06:36, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi 331dot,
 * Could you please help me and unblock my ID I have already accepted and understood my mistake and also apologies for the same. It seems its stuck because I have two request for unblock and I do not know how to close one. Please help
 * Regards
 * Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 19:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear Team,

Could you please unblock my ID. It seems two request going on and I am been inform to remove one but I do not know the process as I am very new in Wikipedia. Could please unblock my ID

Regards

Kartik Kartikm77 (talk) 07:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)