User talk:Kary Arora

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Biography, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Biography was changed by Kary Arora (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903944 on 2012-04-11T09:38:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Help:List. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 10:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Help:List, you may be blocked from editing. —Bruce1eetalk 10:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome
Yes, it can be hard for a newcomer to know which page to edit! I see that you began to write an article on several different pages, provoking those warning messages. You may be interested in some of these links:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

The page User:Kary Arora/sandbox is a great place to develop your draft. However, you'll need to include references to reliable sources to show that other people have already begun to write about her - you can read more about that at the page on 'Notability'.

In addition, if you are Kary Arora or are connected with her in some way, please note that writing an autobiography here is strongly discouraged.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have. Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Please do not write an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Kary Arora. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 20:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kary Arora


The article Kary Arora has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 20:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Removal of Templates
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Kary Arora. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kary Arora, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. RA talkcontribs 22:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Kary Arora, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 03:50, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello Kary Arora. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kary Arora, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. GimliDotNet (talk) 07:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kary Arora, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GimliDotNet (talk) 08:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Do Lafzon ki hai - Remixed by Kary Arora


The article Do Lafzon ki hai - Remixed by Kary Arora has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable musical release.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GimliDotNet (talk) 06:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Warnings and blocking
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kary Arora, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GimliDotNet (talk) 06:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Kary Arora, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You are welcome to continue to edit under this username, but we ask the following:
 * Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
 * Please send an e-mail to [mailto:info-en@wikimedia.org info-en@wikimedia.org]. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles e-mail is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Please note that if you are Arora, prove that, and are unblocked, you generally should not be editing articles about yourself. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:33, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

i assure you that i do not intend to edit the same ways as before please unblock me. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kary Arora (talk • contribs)
 * Then could you please tell us what types of edits or articles you plan to edit if unblocked? That would help us better decide whether unblocking is appropriate. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

i just want to appeal for the speedy deletion of article kary arora. That is all. i assure u that i do not intend to edit. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kary Arora (talk • contribs)


 * The article is not currently being discussed for deletion (though no promises that it won't be proposed for deletion in the future). Thus, there's no need for an unblock. In any event, as we've already said, your comments in this regard wouldn't be helpful, because your only purpose seems to be to promote Arora, and you don't seem to understand (or care about) our policies regarding what are or are not appropriate articles. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

im extremely sorry for the past edits. I was new to wikipedia at that time.i have read the policies thoroughly now and just want to propose article kary arora for speedy deletion pls help in deleting the article.
 * The article shouldn't be deleted; in fact, I've removed all but one of the maintenance tags on it. Kary Aurora appears to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for people. Is there some specific reason why you think it should be deleted? Qwyrxian (talk) 08:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

unfortunately reference 1 has published false names like kary fernandes and karuna arora and also misprinted that kary arora is delhi's first female dj.kary arora is india's 1st female DJ and Music producer which is mentioned correctly in reference 2. Its my mistake to give poor reference and wanted the article to be deleted.
 * Sorry, all I have is your word that the info is wrong, but generally those are considered reliable sources. Even if it is wrong, that would still mean that there are 2 good references, which is enough to keep the article. If you really are Kary Arora, and you are willing to verify that, and you still want the article deleted, you'll need to contact WP:OTRS, verify your identity, and then it may be possible to consider discretionary deletion as a marginally notable subject. ON Wikipedia, we fix articles, not delete them, if the underlying subject is one that is appropriate for encyclopedic coverage. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

ok could you please delete the reference 1 and its related language used in the article and keep reference 2 to fix the article?
 * I will look at them later. But I won't remove them just because you say one is wrong--only if the others seems to indicate the first is wrong. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)