User talk:Kasei0 0

Semi-protected articles
Hello,

Kralizec protected the page at my request due to persistent vandalism which wasn't yours. New accounts such as yours with less than 500 edits can not edit semi-protected pages. This prevents vandals from simply registering & continuing. You were unfortunately caught in the circumstances. My advice would be to enjoy editing other pages while it is temporarily protected. Place the Victorian era article in your watchlist so you will see when it comes off.

We are certainly glad you have joined us and appreciate your contributions. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. I will leave some links below for you to learn more about Wikipedia. Cheers, ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►  ((⊕)) 23:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 * It's only 10 edits and four days. See User access levels. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 18:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valet Girls


The article Valet Girls has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No 3rd party sources demonstrating notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rafal Zielinski


The article Rafal Zielinski has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:21, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Commercial links as references
Thanks for your contributions to massage. However, I notice that you're using commercial links (i.e., suppliers, etc) for some of the references, which is not a good idea per WP:EL. Thanks, OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Category III films for deletion
The article List of Category III films is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Category III films until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 13:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rafal Zielinski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafal Zielinski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rafal Zielinski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)