User talk:Kashi Das

Wow...awesome image of Bhagwan Das! Thanks! &mdash; goethean &#2384; 15:57, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:KrishnaDas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KrishnaDas.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 21:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Neem Karoli Baba
Not true. It is completely consistent. His life before 11 is not known. After 11, some facts are known. The word 'mysterious' does not belong in an encyclopedia article unless you are quoting somebody who has said this. For Ram's sake, there are pictures of his wife and children on neemkarolibaba.com. &mdash;Hanuman Das 02:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah, we have to discount claims of unreasonably long life, though we can report who has said what about them. Looks like Priyanath has also stepping in, so I will step out for a while as he is also very well versed in Wikipedia policy. Really, the article probably need to be cited more, the info is supposed to come from books and not from our own knowledge.


 * PS, please sign your comments with ~, it will automatically add your name and the date, like this: Ram, Ram, Hanuman Das 02:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:RD photo v1 05.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:RD photo v1 05.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  00:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

BabaBhagavanDas.jpg
I have tagged Image:BabaBhagavanDas.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. MER-C 07:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Neemkarolibaba.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Neemkarolibaba.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maharaj-ji.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Maharaj-ji.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)