User talk:Kashifv

May 2016
Hello, I'm Twinsday. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Android (robot), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. serioushat 19:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alt-right, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 03:06, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Discretionary Sanctions for American Politics 2
 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 03:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 09:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Alt-right editing
I am not the gate-keeper of Alt-right. Please use wp:RS. Primary sources can be used in a very limited manner. See No original research I would suggest you use talk:Alt-right and get wp:consensus before adding content, especially given the sanctions (above). I would recommend WP:PINGING to others who have objected to get their attention to achieve consensus more quickly. Expect about a week. See wp:talk page guidelines, specifically WP:TALK. Please keep conversation on this page. Ping me with Remember to sign your talk with four tildes "~" Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emo fascism


A tag has been placed on Emo fascism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ironic nihilism


The article Ironic nihilism has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Simply WP:NOTADICTIONARY with poor sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kashif Vikaas
Hello Kashifv,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kashif Vikaas for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 JTP (talk • contribs) 19:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lauren Southern, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Renewed Discretionary sanctions alert
Doug Weller talk 19:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Ad Orientem. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Dark Enlightenment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Excessive list of links with no apparent relevance
Please see WP:ALSO: "Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent". --Omnipaedista (talk) 04:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content rrelating to living or recently deceased people
Doug Weller talk 08:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Interview Request
I am interviewing a range of Wikipedian subject matter experts for a documentary on the subject. Would you be open to a brief conversation regarding Post-Irony and also your general perspective on the process of contributing to / editing Wikipedia pages?

Thanks, John

E-mail me at m3tawav3@gmail.com