User talk:Kashish pall

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Kashish pall. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. kingboyk (talk) 13:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

This is my one of the big mistake;

This is on my talk page because I found that there is a button G13 where we can re open the pages. I appeal for Sandeep Maheshwari then there is a tag which is written that I didn't put draft. So I think I have to appeal again as Draft Sandeep Maheshwari. That's why other users say what I am doing.Kashish pall (talk) 13:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC) This is on user bri this is a leading reason on my talk page. I come to know at very late and always think to do best editing here. quora Kashish pall (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ashtavakra Gita, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Youtuber Sandeep Maheshwari has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Youtuber Sandeep Maheshwari. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Although I tried to submit source where I got information but system didn't allow me to put the references in links. Please reply me back for such explaination. Kashish pall (talk) 16:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi - I'm following up on the queries you had on RHaworth's talk page. I've looked at the draft, which is currently unsourced and so cannot possibly be accepted. It looks from the draft that you are attempting to use his YouTube channel and his own personal website as sources - the draft will not be accepted unless you can identify a few reliable, independent and secondary sources that given the subject significant coverage. This is discussed at length at WP:GNG, which I already linked you to. You've said above that the system didn't allow you to put the references in links - what sites were you attempting to reference? What error message did you get when you tried to add them? Girth Summit  (blether)  17:04, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

There are three links but if I replied and give those links in text still not allowed to reply back Kashish pall (talk) 17:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

System don't allow me to give links even on this reply Kashish pall (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , what message is it giving you - does mention the blacklist? Girth Summit  (blether)  17:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes it is so Kashish pall (talk) 17:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * In which case the references would not be useable. Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * indeed - you are trying to use a website which has been banned from Wikipedia because of repeated attempts to spam links to it. It is not the sort of source you should be using. Read those links I gave you and try again (or give up, if better sources aren't available). Girth Summit  (blether)  17:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

All the first three references which I wrote in the draft. I tried all three and all get such this. Kashish pall (talk) 17:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , if they are blacklisted, you can't use them. Find better sources, or give up on this. Girth Summit  (blether)  17:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for this, but I have one more query regarding this. May I give references of videos of YouTube and news channels because he is a YouTube celebrate and maximum of information gether by YouTube. One more problem is that he is a kind of person who didn't go for interviews and rejecte their request. His mouth words is a reference. If I give references of any other sites those are generally frod. His mouth words are only true. He explained his whole life story on his own channel. So may I give references of YouTube videos but not of his own channel but the references videos also included him. Because his only words are true. So what I have to do in such situation ? Kashish pall (talk) 03:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

I will not give any link because it may cause trouble. So I only write references in words. May I do so ? Kashish pall (talk) 04:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I've deleted this page. It is not acceptable to circumvent creation protection of a page by creating a slightly variant title.  See also my reply to you at User talk:Spinningspark. SpinningSpark 20:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

https://g.co/kgs/474KQR. Google itself is a proof Kashish pall (talk) 17:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

How to sign posts
Please remember to sign Talk posts with four tildes ~ SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Teahouse, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Your message was on the wrong page. Please read what it says at the top of the page which you were editing.'' David Biddulph (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Sandeep Maheshwari
Hi Kashish pall. I noticed your question on RoySmith's talkpage and looked into it. Sandeep Maheshwari has been created and deleted multiple times for use of promotional language and lack of independent reliable sources. However, on doing a Google search it appears he is well known in India, though less well known in the West. Most sources are Indian newspapers, which do not have the same quality control as Western papers, but there is some evidence that this person is notable. I will work with you on this.

First stage is to create a subpage for us to work on the article together. Here it is: User:Kashish pall/Sandeep Maheshwari. The next stage is to do some research and reading to gather reliable sources which talk about Sandeep Maheshwari. We can put links to these sources on the page I created. And then we can start to build the article using those sources. There is no guarantee that we will be able to create an article to meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, but we can try! SilkTork (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes I very well known him and his popularity is on height in our country as well the country in our surroundings. The country who knows Hindi language watch his videos with full of interest. And I want to work on this title more than 10 days. But I also found that this title under protection due to the commercial use as you told. If you saw that it may be possible that it will create the criteria of Wikipedia or not. I think this will definitely because there is a YouTuber Bhuvan bam whoes article seen on Wikipedia and Sandeep Maheshwari is almost near about him. Kashish pall (talk) 14:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Please also give me the structure for source because I tried but I couldn't make the format which you could do on source page. Kashish pall (talk) 14:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * You are going to need to put some effort in. If you can't acquire basic formatting yourself, then this is going to be difficult for both of us. To see how someone has done something, you can click on "Edit" (or "Edit source" if that shows for you as well) at the top of the page, and you can see how it is done. Use your sandbox (see WP:SANDBOX) to try out formats, and how to write. If you want to learn more, you can search for guidance and advice on Wikipedia by using the search box and putting "WP:" before the word or phrase you want help on. Such as WP:Sources, or WP:Structure. If the words you use don't work, or take you to the wrong place, try something else such as WP:Format, or WP:Layout. Read the pages careful, and follow links. Unfortunately Wikipedia is not easy to use for everyone. If you find it too difficult, then, no worries, you can just gather the evidence, and present it at Requested articles/Biography/By nationality.
 * Some useful links for you to read and study: Help:Editing, Help:Your first article, Contributing to Wikipedia, Help:Introduction and Competence is required. SilkTork (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Although you says that I don't have to put my name I also don't want so but this is happening because I don't know how to do it so but I am doing work on it and need someone time to learn codes. But don't worry I know how to use codes because I also completed course on C language in outer world. I only need time to work as the criteria of Wikipedia. Kashish pall (talk) 17:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

The information about his father, mother ,etc.come from the report alive which is already sourced. Kashish pall (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Is there an article on Sandeep Maheshwari on the Indian Wikipedia? SilkTork (talk) 18:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Is this the same person: ? If so, the Wikidata entry shows an article at https://or.wikipedia.org/s/14ek which has 7 references. Also a Commons category: c:Category:Sandeep Maheshwari Cheers --RexxS (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Sandeep Maheshwari (Q29354628). Yes this person is same. But wrong date is mentioned. 8 is written but it is 28. Kashish pall (talk) 05:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Sandeep Maheshwari is on Indian Wikipedia in Bengali language. Kashish pall (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks RexxS. That's very useful. Kashish pall, can you translate the Bengali article onto the /Sandeep Maheshwari page, along with the references. I'll check the references for that article, and the references we have already collected, and tidy up the language, and then we'll see what we've got. SilkTork (talk) 09:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Don't worry all the references are in english. Kashish pall (talk) 12:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I'm looking at it myself right now. I note that four cites are to Sandeep Maheshwari's own website, and three to his YouTube channel. Those are not acceptable for establishing notability, and need to be used with care in building the article. I would prefer we didn't use those sources at all, given the controversial history of trying to get an article on him onto the English Wikipedia (it has been deleted seven times: and protected so only an admin (such as myself) can create it again). I'll put a machine translation, along with the cites used, on the /Sandeep Maheshwari page, as I can see you are struggling with that. SilkTork (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Are you still interested in creating this article? If so, I would be willing to advise you. The deletion review you initiated decided not to undelete the article in mainspace, but left it open over whether a draft could be created. SpinningSpark 15:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I really don't know why actually deletion log is used but because you says I did this. I found you was unsatisfied with my notability reason. But in deletion log the discussion is closed then how may I tell anything further. Kashish pall (talk) 10:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * My question was simple enough – do you wish to proceed with creating an article, yes or no? If yes, I can help by unlocking the draft page. SpinningSpark</b> 14:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)


 * I am interested to work with this. Me and already start creating it on talk page. So I really need draft space. If it is helpful for creation then you can open the draft. Kashish pall (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok, I had not realised that was happening. I've unsalted the draftspace page and moved the new draft there. <b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b><b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 15:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)


 * We are not ready for draftspace yet User:Spinningspark - I'm still working with User:Kashish pall in their user space to establish if the sources are enough to create a meaningful article, and if the sources are reliable. When we are ready to move things further on, I will be able to do that myself. Would you please return the pages to User:Kashish pall's user space. If you wish to help out there, please do. I have stalled a little, as I've been caught up in other things off-Wiki, so having another experienced user able to examine the sources, and help build the article would be useful. The material that is there is mostly machine translated over from the  Bengali-Wiki article, and is not encyclopedic material. That was for me to see what the Bengali-Wiki article had to say, and what sources they were using. Think of it mainly as notes toward a draft, rather than an actual draft! Regards. SilkTork (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It's OK, I've done it, as I intend to do some work on it this afternoon. SilkTork (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, sorry for poking my nose in. I just didn't want a protected draft page to stand in the way of an article being worked on by an experienced editor. <b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b><b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 18:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * That's cool, you wanted to help out. It's not as easy a task as I first thought, as while there are LOTS of sources, on checking them out it turns out that most are blogs, wikis or self-published, and not reliable. There appears to be an entrepreneurial attitude among Indians that drives a number of them to create websites which mirror other websites with very little in the way of fact checking. I thought I had a useful source here:, but it turns out that it's a vanity book: . I think Sandeep Maheshwari's notability is very borderline, and mostly driven by energetic self-promotion. When we move it into mainspace, I will immediately submit it to AfD to get community consensus on the notability as I'm finding it difficult to judge. SilkTork (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Kashish pall - you recreated the draft article after I had restored it to your userpage, so I have protected it again. Please only work in your userspace until we are ready to proceed further. Problems can be created by pushing forward with this article before it is ready as we have not yet established notability. SilkTork (talk) 16:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes, okay. Kashish pall (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

I found this link when I was watching for Wikimedia commance. I think this will help us. The title we are working on I found on. I think the user didn't full fill the need of Wikipedia. But I think we do and use reliable sources from here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Palak_Padariya/sandbox Kashish pall (talk) 10:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

I caught up the problem and that is we are finding difficulty in notobality the reason is he himself. Because although lots of newspaper want to take his interview but he is the person who reject all the offers. Thousand of mails come to him but he rejecte them. I think this is a biggest cause to find notobality reasons difficult for us. Kashish pall (talk) 10:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * you seem to know a lot of things about Sandeep Maheshwari, like the mail he receives. Are you personally connected in some way? ☆ Bri (talk) 00:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

No, actually he mentioned on his site. www.sandeepmaheshwari.comKashish pall (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Not finding what you described. Can you give us a more exact URL? ☆ Bri (talk) 16:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

www.sandeepmaheshwari.com this is same written in his article. Kashish pall (talk) 07:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

In start I really don't know what I have to do and how to do only SilkTork teaches me in very good manner that's why I know and understand everything thing here. Thank you SilkTork. Your friendly behaviour give me relief and trust on Wikipedia. I don't know whether you know me or not. Whether you read my user page or not. I am very young in age and achieve the big things. Although you told me that I am very slow learner and lack of skills only because of my young age. Today I feel at very less age I achieved huge thing and today I feel because of you. Thank you so much. You told me that I have to move on from the title from Sandeep Maheshwari that's why I chose next title and they claim me as sock pepetery. The claim is actually not true. I only have single account but still blocked me. You are really good teacher. ThankKashish pall (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I really feel that you have used very good source to create Sandeep Maheshwari title and I feel that it get delete. I feel your good research fails within ten days. And even when I asked you to let me create you says no about it and told me to move on. And the next title made me blocked for six months. As I told you that I have joined for very short period of time so there is no guarantee whether I will come back or not after six months. So I did few searches on Sandeep Maheshwari and I found this if it is possible to create the title again you can create it. I could not trust on un experienced editiors ( special of our country) . They try to create again and again these titles like they did with Sandeep Maheshwari, Harsh Beniwal and Amit Bhadana. They repeatedly try to create the article and they are un experience and made other users blocked or create trouble for another user who want to build the title and wants to contribute constructive. I think you are very well known these things. I don't want to left Sandeep Maheshwari title for someone else they will not construct good article and led to the one more delete for the title. I hope you understand. Kashish pall (talk) 06:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

I have checked your new sources and they add no new information. The first uses the promotional language that is part of the concern, the second source I already had in the article. That the first one is in Hindi is suggestive that Sandeep Maheshwari is more a topic for the Hindi Wikipedia than the English one. SilkTork (talk) 07:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

I try to find more good sources so I found this BWafaqs. I hope this is helpful to create good article. First one is in depth coverage. That time we don't have that and second one is new. I tried my best on the search. Kashish pall (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)


 * You need to stop this now Kashish pall. You haven't taken in what I have said to you. 1) Sandeep Maheshwari is not notable enough for the English Wikipedia. 2) There is a long history of poor sourcing and poor quality and promotional article writing by people who are uncritical fans of Sandeep Maheshwari, which means that we are now very prejudiced against any attempt to recreate an article on the topic. 3) The lack of notability combined with the article history means that something VERY SIGNIFICANT would need to change before an article could be attempted. Offering me more of the same stuff is not helpful. 4) And please do take this one in. I am not interested in attempting another article on Sandeep Maheshwari, but I am prepared to assist if you leave the matter alone for AT LEAST six months, AND there are significant reliable new sources writing about Sandeep Maheshwari.
 * To put that clearly and simply: Do not ping me for at least six months. And then ONLY if you have at least FIVE new sources which you have checked via Reliable sources/Noticeboard are acceptable on the English Wikipedia. If you ping me before six months are up or if you don't have at least five reliable sources that you have checked via WP:RSN, then I will not be happy. Is that understood? SilkTork (talk) 20:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Image on Commons
I am looking for an image of Maheshwari that we can use in the article, so I look in Commons and find this: File:Sandeep Maheshwari.jpg which was uploaded by yourself a few days ago, and which you claim is your "own work". It appears to be a professional photograph which Maheshwari uses on his Facebook page: and his YouTube page:. If you took the photograph, then yes you own it, and can upload it. But if you didn't take the photo, then it belongs to Maheshwari and we can't have in on Commons or Wikipedia. If you took the photograph, I assume you would have uploaded it directly. But you uploaded it from Facebook. Did you take the photo? SilkTork (talk) 18:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your meaning is capturing the photo. If yes, then I didn't captured the photo but taken from the Facebook. But that time I get confused about commons policy. And when I checked every one writing "own work" that's why I wrote that. Kashish pall (talk) 10:48, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


 * It will need to be deleted as the image doesn't belong to you. I'm not an admin on Commons, so I can't do that. I'll set up a deletion discussion request. SilkTork (talk) 17:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes, okay if the file violet the copyright then definitely it should be deleted. I am agree with you. Kashish pall (talk) 07:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Sandeep Maheshwari
I have put the article in mainspace, Sandeep Maheshwari, and listed it on AfD: Articles for deletion/Sandeep Maheshwari. We'll see what happens. SilkTork (talk) 12:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Kashish pall/sandbox has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Kashish pall/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

@I am not creating article but I am just watching and use my sandbox Kashish pall (talk) 09:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * May I remove your comment from my sandbox because it is create trouble for me?Kashish pall (talk) 09:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Harsh Beniwal, from its old location at User:Kashish pall/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harsh Beniwal (April 15)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harsh Beniwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Harsh Beniwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Harsh_Beniwal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GSS&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Harsh_Beniwal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

<span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 05:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
I really feel difficult to appeal further because it get two times decline. So I need your little help more. I can only say in my request that I can work to prevent from vandalism but I don't know whether this reason is sufficient or not. I need little more help to appeal the block. Kashish pall (talk) 13:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , please really consider using a different Wikipedia (meta:List of Wikipedias). It may not be possible to unblock you here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I will definitely join that. But I really feel that I didn't even violet any policy by creating different account but still I get blocked as sock pepetery the claim which is not true. So trust on the editor definitely decline and such blocking will not create an trust on other meta list even. It feels that the purpose of violantering work also get diminish. And further trust generated becomes almost impossible. I hope you understand. Sometimes co-incidence happen and in my case it is happened so. But type of guilt generated by blocking for indefinitely which become more painfull and further violantering work become almost difficult. Such kind of blocking left no choice rather being left violantering work and trust. I hope you understand my feelings. ThankKashish pall (talk) 14:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.