User talk:Kasjens


 * }

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Biohydrogen has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKfx3-CpqTQ, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_h08Vbdjt4. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello Kasjens. I noticed that the bot that left you the message above had removed about ¾ of the Biohydrogen article and undone nearly two hours of your work, just because it has a rule about youtube! I have reverted the bot's edit, recovering your work.


 * I've also changed the references in your work to use the Wikipedia referencing facility, which numbers them automatically, sorts them into the order in which they appear in the article, and provides navigation links within the page. This is much easier to maintain, as if you cite a new reference near the beginning of the article, all the others get renumbered. WP uses text "names" on each ref to tie them together – for ease of editing I've used your original "[1]", "[2]", etc as the text names, despite the fact that their numeric values now have no significance except to ensure that they are unique. There were four references in your page (numbers 2, 3, 5 and 15) which were not cited from the text, so I have left them in the page in an html comment so that you can bring them back in if you want to cite them.


 * If I can help in any way, please feel free to contact me. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. — Hebrides (talk) 07:08, 1 July 2010 (UTC)