User talk:Kasko98

March 2024
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Vehicle insurance. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear Sam Kuru,
 * I understand your concerns regarding external links on Wikipedia. However, the link I added is purely informational, focusing on the 'Collision Car Insurance' topic without any promotional content or advertisements. It's a knowledge base aimed at educating, not promoting. As a long-time Wikipedia contributor, I respect and understand the guidelines. I added this reference to an unreferenced section to improve content quality and validity. I invite discussion on the article's talk page to assess the link's relevance and adherence to Wikipedia's standards. Kasko98 (talk) 15:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It's a two-week old proxied blog with cursory content and AI clipart. Do not add the link again. And congratulations on your "long time" tenue of two hours. Sam Kuru (talk) 15:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * How have you determined that it is a proxy blog? These are serious accusations, and you will face legal consequences.
 * What do you mean by saying that the images are AI clipart? This is not relevant to the topic.
 * The blog is focused on content, specifically on the topic of Collision Car Insurance. Please provide a specific example where the content:
 * 1. is inaccurate
 * 2. is irrelevant
 * 3. violates Wikipedia rules
 * 4. is of poor quality
 * Regardless of your response, after several warnings, we are compelled to initiate legal action. Kasko98 (talk) 16:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)



Hello, Kasko98. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 81.187.192.168 (talk) 15:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Legal threats
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Sam Kuru (talk) 15:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Kasko98 (talk) 16:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Really? You are clearly blocked for violating no legal threats You clearly made a legal threat here.  And you repeated the threat in this unblock request. While we think it's OK that you want to seek redress outside of Wikipedia's WP:dispute resolution processes, You cannot edit Wikipedia while doing so. Please follow the embedded link for more information. Unless the threat is withdrawn or the legal action concluded, you cannot be unblocked from editing. The organization is not spam, Your adding the link to it is. Case? Please read what the WP:GAB says about treating an unblock request like a legal proceeding. A private website has blocked you from editing its encyclopedia for violating its rules. Please fix your unblock request to address these concerns. Thanks&#45;-  Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The second undo was accidental; I didn't intend to remove anything other than the reference.
 * I thought it was permissible to remove references, especially since the topic was my reference being removed. Therefore, I assumed it was okay to remove the reference, especially if it was for discrediting purposes. I explained everything in the edit summary.
 * Understand that I don't have the right to do that, but this way, the person discrediting the organization will face legal consequences. Kasko98 (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Let's be clear once again. My warning about legal consequences applies exclusively to adding a reference to the organization and accusing it of being a bot or spam.
 * It does not concern the topic; I am willing to debate the reasons for removing my edit, but I am not okay with the part where the organization is clearly discredited and labeled as spam. Kasko98 (talk) 16:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Two issues are at hand.
 * 1. The removal of my edit, which I am willing to discuss with Wikipedia editors and responsible individuals.
 * 2. The labeling of the organization, where it is clearly implied that the organization is spam by adding a spam subdomain to the organization's domain. There is no debate about this part, and if it is not removed, we will initiate all legal avenues tomorrow. Kasko98 (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 17:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)