User talk:Kasra123

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Castle Crashers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Castle Crashers was changed by Kasra123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858288 on 2011-10-30T22:41:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Portal 2 with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 22:46, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Portal 2 has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 22:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. --Teancum (talk) 23:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Castle pootzors


A tag has been placed on Castle pootzors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 23:56, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Castle Crashers. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   23:56, 30 October 2011 (UTC)