User talk:Kat is amazing

Silly edits
On this edit of yours: In the future, if you'd like to write something silly, please do so in the "sandbox". -- Hoary (talk) 01:48, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but it was kinda an experiment for school. Our Social Studies teacher told us to try it out and see how long it took before the "mistake" was fixed. We were trying to prove to our English teacher that Wikipedia was a realible source for our research paper. Kat is amazing (talk) 02:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a reliable source for a research paper. Proof of its unreliability is already abundant and needn't be added to. Where not vandalized, it may be a useful first resource. Anyone who thinks that unreliability means worthlessness is of course free not to use it at all.


 * Please ask your Social Studies teacher to read this.


 * Perhaps you and your teachers would like to contribute to Wikipedia constructively. Such contributions are always welcome. -- Hoary (talk) 05:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Kat is amazing
User:Kat is amazing, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kat is amazing and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Kat is amazing during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  06:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

User category proposed deletion
You may be interested in Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)