User talk:Katebrown83

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello, Katebrown83, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. We're so glad you're here! --GreenJoe 05:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

With regard to tagging articles
I saw your question at the NCH, but felt that a more specific answer was warranted. The general cleanup template is OK, but it is always preferable to be more specific with the choice of tag (or tags) where possible. In this case, copyedit and NPOV are appropriate choices. Don't forget to date tag them, and some comments on the talk page are often an important addition when tagging articles. This helps other editors to know exactly what issues you have identified and where in the article they are. And as always, if you can fix it yourself, please do so. You will find all the tags that you need at Template messages. Regards, Adrian   M. H.  18:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

James Robson
I took a look at the James Robson article, and noticed the revision history was unusually long for it's content. Turns out the edit you nominated was a vandal edit. I reverted to the true content. DarkAudit 06:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)