User talk:Katelovesdesign212

July 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Design515, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Misha Kahn have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:44, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ini Archibong
Hi. This is in reply to the email you sent me. First, unless I establish a relationship with another editor, I never respond to emails via email. That being said, having looked at your email, I have a few questions, and several suggestions. First the questions:
 * 1) What is your relationship to User:Electriclamb?
 * 2) I'm assuming you're the ip editor who removed the prod tag, correct?
 * 3) Do you have any relationship with User:LuGgcy?

Now the suggestions.
 * 1) First, follow the instructions on WP:COI and WP:UPE about how to declare your conflict.
 * 2) Second, don't email other editors.  Most won't even respond if they don't know who you are.  Simply post on their talk page.
 * 3) Find an editor who is interested in writing the article for you.  Most editors who work on WP are volunteers, and paid editing, while not prohibited, is frowned upon. You can also make a generic request on Requested articles.  I've been asked literally hundreds of times to write articles.  In the over 10 years on WP, I've only had my interest piqued enough to write 3 of them, all without pay (an astronomy organization, an Australian cruise ship operator, and an European economist).

All that being said, looking at the refs (in the article, and those you sent me) he definitely looks notable.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you can't find someone to write the article in a few days, circle back and I'll take a crack at it. I looked at some of the articles and I like his style.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear User:One15969, Thank you so much for taking the time to respond to explain this to me. It is much appreciated. I'm happy to hear that you are intrigued by Mr. Archibong's aesthetic. I would hate that the public would not have the opportunity to learn about Mr. Archibong's practice because of my mistake and ignorance about Wikipedia practices. Please find answers to your questions below.

1.   What is your relationship to User:Electriclamb? I do not know Electriclamb or have any relationship. I only discovered the existence of Mr. Archibong's Wikipedia page a few weeks ago. 2.   I'm assuming you're the ip editor who removed the prod tag, correct? Yes, correct. I didn't understand why that tag was placed there and foolishly assumed it was an error. 3.   Do you have any relationship with User:LuGgcy? Yes, she is my colleague. As Mr. Archibong is in the Visual Arts field, I asked her to assist in uploading visual content to Wiki Commons thinking this would also offer more context into Mr. Archibong's approach and notable projects. Katelovesdesign212 (talk) 15:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ini Archibong has been accepted
 Ini Archibong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ini_Archibong help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)