User talk:Katerg

Hi Katerg, I was going to leave you a welcome message, but I see in the history that User:Sam Spade already has. Welcome anyway. I just wanted to explain my reversion of your more neutral edit to Climate change. The statement was already qualified with can ... be..., so your may addition was a bit redundant. Vsmith 01:44, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Raking the sandbox
Thanks for raking the sandbox(this edit); I just wanted to let you know that nonsense is, unlike in the rest of Wikipedia, semi-tolerated in the sandboxes. So a comment like, removing nonsense is slightly more WP:BITE that is optimum. It's a very minor issue, but I thought I'd mention it. Thanks for your work on the 'pedia! JesseW 22:40, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tig logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tig logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

May 2014
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Film and Television Institute a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Evad37 &#91;talk] 13:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Suzanne Waldron for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suzanne Waldron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Suzanne Waldron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 15:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of David Fono for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Fono is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Fono until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Triplekatetig.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Triplekatetig.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)