User talk:Katerina64

April 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gwen Chua Xue Qiu, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 15:12, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gwen Chua Xue Qiu


A tag has been placed on Gwen Chua Xue Qiu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ... disco spinster   talk  00:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Gwen Chua Xue Qiu. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  01:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Shouldn't be removed because other youtubers/blogger also have their own page

Nomination of Gwen Chua for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gwen Chua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gwen Chua until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Gwen Chua. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I Notify Online 07:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Katerina64. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article When You Don't Have A Pen, You Die., you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

The conflict of interest is based on your claim to have created the cover art for the book. —C.Fred (talk) 02:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
I have blocked you as a suspected sockpuppet of User:Gwencxq, as you have re-created articles for the blogger word for word, which is almost always a sign of a WP:SOCKPUPPET. Editing under different usernames without stating that you are all the same user is against Wikipedia's rules and is a blockable offense. You can edit under the original account, but please be aware that you should not re-create any articles for the blogger. She just isn't notable enough for an entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)