User talk:KaterinaLK

Conflict of interest
Hello, KaterinaLK. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 09:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * You have a conflict of interest. You are not including references for your edits, which include subjective opinion. You need to find a reliable third-party source that supports your viewpoint. You are hardly a neutral party. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 09:42, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is supposed to be a serious encyclopedia containing articles with true content. Refernces should be included if other users find the info controversial, which is what happens in this case. 76.102.49.177 is not really accusing you of including false info, he just wants proof. Cheers, Hop n hop  (on the arctic ice) 09:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)