User talk:Kateshortforbob/Archives2007/November

Finland Plot
Thanks for your edits to the Finland Plot article. Patiwat 07:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Addhoc 15:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Sheerness FAC
Hi. I'm sorry to bother you, but as a LoCE member, I just wondered if you would be willing to have a look through the Sheerness article. It is currently a Featured Article Candidate and needs a copy-edit for grammar by someone who hasn't yet seen it. Any other ways to improve the article would also be welcome. Thank you very much, if you can. Epbr123 12:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Conversion of canal water into drinking water
Hi. :-) Many thanks for your efforts on Conversion of canal water into drinking water, but I think that this "article" will be deleted post-haste (surprised it is still there days later, to be honest).

BTW, big fan of Blackadder, so couldn't resist acknowleding your username. :-D Please put at least a basic user page (as I have recently done for myself) - it makes you more human, and allows you to explain where your nick came from. Leevclarke 00:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Username
I just wanted to say, great username. :) --Yamla 19:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --kateshortforbob 19:44, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Michael Pelster
Thanks for your note. By the time I read it, the article had already been deleted again. FYI - there's no problem with adding the speedy deletion tag again if you believe it meets the criteria (which this one pretty clearly did). If the author disagrees, he's supposed to take it to WP:DRV rather than re-create it. Frankly, I can't see any way this subject will meet the notability guidelines. So, if he doesn't take it to DRV and persists in re-creating, it may need to be salted - but I hope he got the message.

By the way, your analysis was spot on and I like the way you bent over backwards to be patient and try to help the author. Feel free to drop me a line if you ever need help or advice. I can't say I know everything (this place is huge), but I'm happy to share what I do know.-- Kubigula (talk) 02:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Conserve africa foundation
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Conserve africa foundation, and it appears to be a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Aston Villa F.C.
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on Aston Villa F.C. A little hint to make your life easier: If you have to undo multiple instances of vandalism use the compare selected versions tab and you can revert multiple edits! Thanks again! Woodym555 22:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Random smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. &mdash;Viriditas | Talk 11:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Bandagi Miyan Syed Khumdmir Rz


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Well done, you beat me to the speedy tag of this page, i'd only just managed to find the copyvio--Jac16888 15:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Patrick o'dell
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Patrick o'dell, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Patrick o'dell is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Patrick o'dell, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 17:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Czechoslovakia
You are absolutely right. Though only from technical point of view. Let me explain. My grandfather was born (1908) in Austro-Hungarian monarchy, in the region what has soon become Fist Czechoslovak Rep (1918). In 1939 his country changed it's name again. It was Slovak state/ rep now. Six years later, after World War II. (1945), it was Czechoslovakia again. In 1960 somebody decided Czechoslovak Socialist Rep sound better. Revolution in November 1989. 1990 new name once again - Czecho-Slovak Federal Rep. 1993, finally Czech rep and Slovakia. My grandad was just common man, proud Slovak - never czechoslovak although he was citizen of several form of Czechoslovakia almost all his life. My parents were born in 50s. In Czechoslovakia. I was born in 1979. In Czechoslovak Socialist Rep. My youngest sister was born in 1990. In Czecho-Slovak Federal Rep. All our papers says born in Slovakia. Nationality - Slovak. Those NHL players may have been born in Czecoslovakia but they always have been and will be Slovaks and Czechs. Both countries were too small to be recognised in 1918 so it was great political move to put them together then. Idea of Czechoslovakia diddn't work out though. Based in Belfast you should know what I'm talking about. Process of identification is going on right now over here in central Europe.

Anuway, talking about Montreal Canadiens... Mathieu Dandenault born Sherbrooke, Quebec. Josh Gorges born Kelowna, British Columbia. I thought they are Canadiens! Bryan Smolinski born Toledo, Ohio. Christopher Higgins born Smithtown, New York. I thought they are citizens of the USA! Shouldn't it be Jaroslav Halak born in Bratislava, Slovakia and Roman Hamrlik born in Gottwaldov, Czech Rep then?! Hope you get my point.

It would really help/ would really appreciate if you don't make people confused about where are those players from. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sasalap (talk • contribs) 13:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Zoe Grant
A tag has been placed on Zoe grant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pilotboi / talk / contribs 19:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know; it's not mine, I just moved it for capitalisation, then realised notability was dubious. --kateshortforbob 19:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Angel Capital Education Foundation
Hi. I see that you did some rather heavy editing to the 'Angel Investor' article, and perhaps also deleted the article on the Angel Capital Education Foundation, apparently because of "copyright" concerns. Since nothing whatsoever in either article was subject to copyright (except perhaps the name of the foundation itself, the use of which in an encyclopedia article certainly comes under the heading of 'fair use') I am at a loss to understand what is going on. I'd appreciate it if you would clarify what went on here, and why, otherwise I'm going to assume that it was just a mistake and will revert the articles, thanks. Yorker 22:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I left a message on your talk page. -- Kateshort forbob  10:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Buxton
Thanks for the edits. I agree that obviously Greggs is not notable, but I wonder if we should mention any of the notable commercial businesses/hotels/restaurants in Buxton? I've eaten at Columbine and also found the restaurant at the Lee Wood (now Best Western) Hotel to be excellent, but maybe we shouldn't open this can of worms. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 15:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

20-20-20-20 club
A template has been added to the article 20-20-20-20 club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. User:Pedant 17:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-of-affiliation-quebec-canadian-political party.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logo-of-affiliation-quebec-canadian-political party.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 12:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Help: UNC Chapel Hill School of Journalism Page I work at the School of Journalism and personally wrote much of the material on the Website. I don't understand why I have to rewrite it for your Website. It's my work. That's why I put it up here. What's the deal? Do I have to rewrite everything? I worked hard on the page the first time and spent a whole work day doing it. I am very disappointed it was taken down and my work was thrown away. LINK TO THE UNC JOMC PAGE

Rachel Lillis Assistant Director for Executive Education and Distance Education School of Journalism and Mass Communication University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CB 3365, Carroll 309 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3365 —Preceding unsigned comment added by RLLillis (talk • contribs) 18:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I've left a message with some information on your talk page. Thanks! -- Kateshort forbob  19:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Lauren Fischer
Hi... Have a look here for the answer to the mystery: the editor recreated it after it had been speedied, which is rather a no-no. You could nominate to be speedied again with and withdraw the AfD, or you could note in the AfD that the article was speedied and recreated without admin permission. I'd tend to go with the former. It didn't make any assertion of notability the first time around, and still doesn't as far as I can tell. Being a murder victim isn't a claim to notability, and neither is being a backup singer for Michael Jackson. I'd just speedy it again if I were you and warn the editor against recreation, but I'll leave that decision in your capable hands, cause I gotta run and pick up the kids. :) Cheers.  --Rrburke(talk) 21:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like I may have steered you wrong there: I thought applied to speedied articles -- my mistake.  Prodded articles don't qualify either.  Who knew?  Well, I should have.  --Rrburke(talk) 00:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mark Beauchamp Taylor
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Beauchamp Taylor, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Cosmo0 22:25, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Izzy Santino article
hi. im very sorry for this, i am new to starting a new article. how do i get it on and stay on? Do i need permission from Mr Santino to do so? Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darylmurphy (talk • contribs) 10:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Holcomb article cleaned up
I cleaned up the Steven Holcomb article if you wish to look. Chris 14:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. At least it is how the rest of the bobsleigh articles are supposed to be. Chris 19:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Deletion tto Vernon Howard knowledge base
Kates,

Okay, the guidelines asked us to be civil. You talk about "self-promotion." SuperWisdom Foundation is a registered IRS educational nonprofit. Even with that considered, I saw nothing in the guidelines about even a regular profit making enterprise adding to an entry, as long as it is not over the top, but neutral and informing.

I believe a third party would easily see a very legitimate connection between SuperWisdom Foundation and Vernon Howard. Just search Amazon for the book SuperWisdom and note the people buying it and what they have purchased -- all Vernon Howard books!

Links abound on the www.SuperWisdom.com site to Vernon Howard. There are so many reasons this entry should be allowed.

Let's work together to find something we are both comfortable with, so it is resolved here. The latest entry you deleted was this:

You may also find the work at the SuperWisdom Foundation interesting. A weekly podcast tours the wisdom of the ages, and Tom's book "SuperWisdom" highlights his twelve years of work with author Vernon Howard. http://www.superwisdom.com

How about: SuperWisdom Foundation also delves into Vernon Howard's work, and the founder studied with Vernon Howard for many years. There is a podcast and other free material. (then the URL.)

So relatively few people are interested in these inner development topics. You obviously are one that is, so let's start from that point of mutual interest and resolve this here.

Tom Russell SuperWisdom Foundation —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomHRussell (talk • contribs) 12:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied at User talk:TomHRussell -- Kateshort forbob  17:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Kate: Tom here regarding deletion to V.Howard Knowledge Base
Kate, I've simply added a line regarding SuperWisdom Foundation right in the paragraph where others of like nature are referenced. I understand your point better now. Thanks for the clarification.

I did add a link down in "References" but I'm not sure I spaced it correctly.

Again, thank you for your assistance. Hope this will now fly as it is indeed a legitimate addition.

Tom Russell SuperWisdom Foundation —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomHRussell (talk • contribs) 18:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Isofoton
Hi!!! is the article about Isofoton fine now?

By the way, can you help me to get rid of a category I created? "Companies of Andalucía" Andalucia with "C" is not an English word, is Spanish. But I cannot get rid of it.

Regards

Victor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor Lledo (talk • contribs) 13:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've left a reply on your talk page. -- Kateshort forbob  13:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Lovely article!!! :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.77.255.188 (talk) 13:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I had fun doing it! -- Kateshort forbob  14:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

MOLLINGTON
WHY SO BRUTAL WITH YOUR EDIT, IT MADE A LOT OF PEOPLE SMILE, LOT OF WORK FOR NOTHING.

THE STORY RE THE GOLF CLUB IS 100% VERIFIABLE, YOU COULD AT LEAST RESTORE THAT.

pj —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soopahstar (talk • contribs) 16:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've replied on your talk page. -- Kateshort forbob  17:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

You sand tomk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joekid23334 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I Like talk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joekid23334 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've left a message on your talk page. -- Kateshort forbob  21:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Mollington
Yes that is fair comment.

The story re King Charles is also true though it was somewhat embelished with a bit of local flavour, I will rewrite it and repost.

The comment relating to cocaine and crack addicts was not me.

Also "The Pink Village" is also true and accurate and received national ppress coverage, out of a population of 513 there are 17 known gays, all of whom are very open about and proud of their sexuality, inddeed it was they who coined the name.

Personally I think they are just a buch of poofs.

Cheers

PJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soopahstar (talk • contribs) 12:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

user pages
hello. I saw your comment on my page. Sorry for all the talk. I got another of my friends to make a page and she won't stop annoying me. She's had it for a week and dosen't exactly know what to do with it. Though I have a question I've been meaning to ask someone with more experience here. My question is if they're talk pages, wouldn't you TALK on them? I mean, I know you talk about the main page or whatever, but people say "hi" and nobody gets them, and saying "hi" always starts a convo anyway, you know? Just wondering. I'll make sure my friend dosen't do it again.
 * Lover of the sand 18:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)*
 * I've replied on your talk page. -- Kateshort forbob  23:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)



has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thanks for helping me!!!! It is kinda confusing here, even being here for a few months. I get it now though, it makes sense. Thanks!!!!!
 * ):):)*Lover of the sand 15:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC)*

AWB
I've approved you to use AWB, per your request. SQL(Query Me!) 08:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Please don't do trivial edits like this one: Haukur 22:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Or this one: It doesn't matter one whit whether the stub template comes before or after the categories, I have no idea why AWB tries to standardize 'after' when I think most human users' intuition is to go with 'before'. Replacing underscores in filenames with spaces is also not worth an edit. Haukur 22:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * See WP:AWB for more on what not to do - and good luck. Haukur 23:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Apologies - I shall avoid it until I better understand the rules. -- Kateshort forbob  19:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi. Thanks for going on my user page. Your the first person I don't know outside of Wiki to write any comments. Love your name, Kateshotforbob! Well, see ya! Ichliebezuko 15:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Rex Gildo
Thank you a lot for solving this issue! --Lamme Goedzak 20:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

GlassCobra's RfA
Nelsondog (talk) 01:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Nelsondog Hi Kateshortforbob! This is just a little message that I'd like to leave to say 'thanks' for answering my question on communication. That was really helpful, and I realise now that the reason I was blocked for using my friend's account was that he was a vandal. Thanks again, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelsondog (talk • contribs) 22:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

posting from more than one account
Back in the early seventies prior to personal computers but following graduation from computer tech school where access to the school's computer was permitted I began a news letter with a multiple question and answer format that reported the running statistics of responses to questions. Each user was identified by address until one day we got a complaint that someone was able to vote twice simply by using a different address for each vote. The way we solved this was not to accuse users of double voting but rather to change our method of identifying each vote not be address but by social security number.

This worked for awhile until we found that some people have been issued more than one social security number so we numbered each newsletter and each question such that the numbers had to be included with each vote. Then we found that some people were going to a retirement center where subscribers were just chucking their copy and then using the numbers we provided so we had to add the social security number again. We then got complaints that unless a subscriber had a social security number and a newsletter of their own they could not vote. Boy. Were we ever glad when the Internet came along. After the Internet we were able to track all of their voting with opinions about things like personal beliefs about sexual matters or drugs etc.

One day we got a visit from the CIA who wanted to know about a certain subscriber. Geeze we thought. Here we have made it possible to track how and what a person thinks and now the government wants a look at our records. Is this moral, we thought, to provide the information we have gathered without the persons knowledge or even suspicion that the government might be looking in? We had a hard time finding the records and after the CIA left we decided not to track the opinions or comments or voting or use of our newsletter by private citizens anymore.

A few months later we hired a new manager and unbeknownst to us he modified the new user (TOS) agreement that required agreement that any information provided was public information. After we got complaints from users and subscribers began to fall off we then fired the new manager, wrote a privacy policy and updated the user agreement to require the CIA to get a court order to obtain any statistics on an individual from us.

In short we think it is a bad idea to track people's opinions, comments, questions, interests and we find anyone or any organization who does suspect of an ulterior motive such as the Nazis most certainly had and otherwise not to be trusted. Enjoy! Dichotomous 21:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied at your talk page. -- Kateshort  forbob  09:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Payton85
All I wanted was to make a page for a fictional league I created, it is not a fantasy football league, & I would like to keep the page, I will also put that it has nothing to do with your league. Payton85 00:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Payton85
I have changed it from the Backyard Football League to the B.F.L, sorry for any inconvence Payton85 00:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I've left a message on your talk page.-- Kateshort  forbob  10:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

The Crucible
Thanks for locating the last good version. I went ahead and reverted the plot summary section to that version and cancelled the copyvio alert now that it appears good. Arakunem Talk 15:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Lyudmila Putina
Is it correct with the "a" at the end, considering that her husband doesn't have the "a"? --Brewcrewer (talk) 08:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied on your talk page. -- Kateshort  forbob  09:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)