User talk:Katesisco

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Katesisco. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Sindinero (talk) 12:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Katesisco (talk) 17:36, 29 August 2019 (UTC)I am curious to know if there is a push to identify below norm, listed in WIKI as 100 IQ, in selecting for marriage? While the closure of mental hospitals for land reselling is common, the individuals then are the parents responsibility, 92% as Wiki says only 8% have the luxury of a group home. With the cost to society at 3/4 of a million dollars a year in lost productivity, why not identify mental retardation in utero? Science says mental retardation is identifiable as low response from all brain regions. I suspect that identification of mental retardation, below 100, would be a significant impediment to marriage brokers. Glib talk is easily used by mental retardation people and easily dismissed on social media like Facebook. Genuine marriage brokers practiced by for example the Jewish faith, would exclude mental retardation from participation, why then, is there not the availability of marriage and dating services that screen for mental retardation? Instead we use a go-around, the college education.