User talk:Katherinebelissa

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 14:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 14:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Copyright issues with your content
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Syrthiss (talk) 14:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I have now protected the article from your edits. Technically at this point I should make you aware of WP:3RR, and warn you that further attempts to revert the article will be grounds for blocking...but as the article is protected, you wouldn't be able to revert and hopefully will begin discussion.  I suspect you are the user I blocked a few minutes ago who claims to be the NVA, but that assurance isn't good enough for us to accept copyright violations.  Please follow the instructions at WP:IOWN or the information given above to release the content with a wikipedia acceptable license.  Please be advised that doing so will not mean that your preferred text will remain inviolate, but will be able to be edited by other editors.  Cheers. Syrthiss (talk) 14:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to NVA (arts organisation), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits are in violation of our copyright policies as well as the injunction to remain neutral. Drmies (talk) 18:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing the encyclopedia because of repeated attempts to insert copyrighted material into NVA (arts organisation) with no indication that the material is eligible under a Wikipedia compatible licenses. If you wish to dispute this block, please add (cut and pasted directly as it appears here, replacing 'your reason here' with your explanation) to this page and another administrator will review it. To the reviewing administrator - the previous protection on the article expired a month ago, and this user's first edit to the page was to reinsert the material. If she shows an understanding of the issues here and is willing to work to resolve it I have no objection to an unblock. Syrthiss (talk) 18:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)