User talk:Kathleenslamon01

helpme I'm working hard on the Brandworkers International page. Can anyone take a look and give suggestions? Is the logo ok, or does it make the page seem too biased?

Also, how can I fix the title at the top? It now reads "Brandworkers international" and I'd like to capitalize the 'i'


 * Hi there, the logo looks fine, Brandworkers international now redirects to Brandworkers International which is the page you are working on.


 * I did an automated peer review and here are the results!

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, The   Helpful   One  (Review) 19:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
 * Consider adding more links to the article; per Manual of Style (links) and Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
 * Per Wikipedia:Context and Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.[?]
 * Per Manual of Style (headings), avoid capitalizing words in section headings unless they are proper nouns or the first word of the heading.[?]
 * This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

Response
Hi! I have reviewed your article and it has promise. I am suggesting that you expand the article by explaining mroe about the services offered. Many editors like to see more information about the subject and its current status, if you know what I mean. Also, do you have any history that you can add to the article?  D u s t i talk to me 19:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Provide some information on when the organization was started, what they are up to now, ect. Give as much informatio as possible without making the article sound like an Adverstisement.  D u s t i talk to me 19:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

helpme
helpme

My help question is this: Hello, I am a first page Wiki-writer and though I have read all the advice and used the sandbox, I'm still having trouble.

Problem: I cannot get the page to update itself, it is missing over half the text which appears in the 'editing' page. Can any one help? Kathleenslamon01 (talk) 19:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Fixed it - with, then at the bottom, use reflist, and it will show all your references. I have fixed it for you though :)  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  19:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Brandworkers international
A tag has been placed on Brandworkers international requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 18:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Brandworkers international
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brandworkers international, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Brandworkers international.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 19:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Brandworkers international
I have nominated Brandworkers international, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Brandworkers international. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Soxred93 | talk bot 19:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Brandworkers international
Your Brandworkers international article shows a lot of promise. Keep it up! Hazillow (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)