User talk:KathrynLybarger/Archives/2008/03

Re:Erica-->Erika
Yeah, I noticed a few minutes back on my watchlist. It's ok with me. Thanks for the notification, and happy editing. Malinaccier (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

P.S. If you got your Wikipedia-space edit count up to 500 or so, you could seriously consider adminship. =)

Marc Metdepenningen
Hallo - thank you for cheking and improving the stub Marc Metdepenningen !- perhaps you could do so for Jane Daniel and Sarah Wiener - thanks Pinus pinea (talk) 07:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * good morning in America - and perhaps also improve the write stub Nine Moati - thank you ! Pinus pinea (talk) 20:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * thank you Pinus pinea (talk) 08:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem! -- KathrynLybarger (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Parliamentary procedure stubs
Hi Kathryn, Thanks for your stub sorting efforts.

I noticed that you put a government stub on Motion that brings a question again before the assembly. However, parliamentary procedure is not only used in governmental bodies, but also by private organizations. I wonder if there is another type of stub that would be more appropriate? I'd create one, but I've heard that's discouraged, and I'm not sure there will be a large number of articles needed to encompass the entire field of parliamentary procedure anyway. Thanks, Obuibo Mbstpo (talk) 18:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Barbara Bouchet
What's going on ?

The Superstrangevideo web page is not even accessible on the Internet.

I am the one who wrote and referenced this article. I have never even heard of Superstrange Video nor have I ever copied anything from them. If any copying has been done, then they have copied from Wikipedia not vice versa.

Tovojolo (talk) 19:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I did not look closely enough at the SuperStrangeVideo article, but I now see that it says Condensed from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia at the bottom. Congratulations -- your article is famous!  I have removed the copyvio tag from the article you wrote on Wikipedia.  Sorry! -- KathrynLybarger (talk) 19:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia
I note that you only joined Wikipedia a few months ago and I am astonished that you feel you are competent to judge articles given your level of inexperience.

Please be careful in the future. Wikipedia is a vicious place. I will overlook this but others would not. If you had done this on somebody else's article, then they would have gone after you and any hope or dream you have of being a Wikipedia Admin one day would be gone for ever.

Tovojolo (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

A true Wikipedian
I create a few new obscure pages and within the hour you have re-categorised them and made other changes. WELL DONE!

Institute for Information Industry, Aday Technology, MiTYBOOK are all the better for your visit. Please fell free to look at my other pages and improve them also :)

Do not be put off by past mistakes, wiki technology allows for this (i.e. nothing is lost, all is recoverable). Wikipedia may seem a vicious place to some; but it is meant to be, and mostly is, a collaborative community. The copyvio tag as placed on Barbara Bouchet is a strong one and liable to upset any author and I guess you have learnt your lesson. Be aware that there are numerous websites which re-present information gleaned from wikipedia; most cite wikipedia but a number don't, so check and re-check before assuming wikipedia is guilty. Please continue your good work. --Brian R Hunter (talk) 21:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup templates
Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "Unreferenced", "Fact" and etc., are best not "subst"ed. See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards,

Reef balls
Thanks for helping with trying to clean up this article. However it seems that the subject is already better covered on an existing page, so I've changed it to a re-direct and categorised the target appropriately. As ever, feel free to revert to your version if you disagree. --BrucePodger (talk) 00:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Stub - Category? Fiador (tack)
What Stub category do I put the above article under? Kathleen.wright5 13:02, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello! I would use a  tag and just make it a general horse stub.  I don't see a more specific stub category for horse tack, and there seem to be some  other horse tack articles (such as Aurigan) in there.


 * Hope this helps! &mdash; KathrynLybarger (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)