User talk:Kathy Anderson

Your edits on Kathy Anderson
Removing the content on the article Kathy Anderson and changing it to be an article on yourself is completely inappropriate. Not only did you remove the hard work of many people, but you replaced it with borderline spam, unsourced content. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place for you to advertise your brokering firm.

Acebulf (talk) 13:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Acebulf - As I am sure you are aware sometimes when someone creates a page with a name that can be shared with many people there is sometimes a glitch that occurs where one overwrites the other. The Kathleen Anderson that you reverted back to is correct - but we did not at anytime delete any of that information and are not sure how it happened as it we entered information as a new page initially and we certainly did not replace anything with what you refer to as Spam. Kathy Anderson of Progress Capital has been in business in NYC and NJ for over 30 years and has written 100's of published articles that have been circulated by the likes of the New York Times, The Real Deal, The Miami Herald and The NY Post and many more that need not be mentioned. She is interviewed monthly by major news organizations and is a featured speaker at over 20 major events a year. Kathy of Progress is a notable expert in her field and extremely high profile in the United States and in particular the NY region. As you know - there are rules that apply to wikipedia entries where a name can be shared by multiple people and we will ensure that both women can be featured as they both deserve the obvious recognition. However - you understand the implications of suggesting we are attempting to spam wikipedia when in fact we can provide hundreds of more documented references than the entry you refer to and as you know both are simply Professionals with a large body of work - both are published and both are featured on camera as professionals. Meaning both can be featured on wikipedia. Please, before you run with accusations of SPAM do the research about the other person because what you have stated above is inaccurate. We have inquired of wikipedia how to ensure both entries can be present and when advised will make sure nothing is deleted when we re-enter our information and references. Also note - while our username is Kathy Anderson we are working on behalf of her organization and not to be implied you are speaking directly with her - but chose so to have a more professional connection to the content we edit instead of something meaningless.


 * My apologies if I was a bit harsh earlier. We deal with a lot of people that try to use Wikipedia as an advertising platform, so some edits might be erroneously classified as spam. If that wasn't your intention, I apologize. That being said, since you're working on behalf of Kathleen Anderson, you have to disclose that according to the Conflict of interest guidelines.


 * If you believe Ms. Anderson to be notable, and want to create an article on her, then it would be wise to check out WP:AFC. Articles for creation is a project that helps newcomers in creating articles that will not infringe on the guidelines, and therefore won't be deleted. You can also leave a message on my talk page with any further questions. Acebulf (talk) 02:36, 26 May 2018 (UTC)