User talk:Katieh5584/Archive 2

A barnstar for you!
Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Paul Martin, English journalist based in ireland
Hi KatieH, you should maybe read the following before reverting edits to an incorrect version of the biography. http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/48692 And maybe this also: http://www.hotpress.com/news/Paul-Martin-departs-The-Mirror/8684933.html 192.193.116.142 (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC) John D. 192.193.116.142 (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

You need to update the article properly.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

About removing large amount of total content
hello..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalpana_Chakma

here is the link that i am talking about. This is containing hate sppech about People's republic of bangladesh army. all those infos are false. and it is planned. as they have given lot many references. but all are made by them. they like to make a separate country. they dnt want to be with us. and actually they are not children of this soil. they have came from other countries while they were sent back for their activities. i am talking so much.

all i want to tell is, this feature shouldn't be here.

these all are fake. doesn't have any truth inside it.

thanks for your patience reading. good day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.47.143 (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

LVHS network contributions and IPs (this IP)
Hello. I edit as `whitingcameron` but would like to note the changes made by this IP. Replying to edits made, by this IP, shows our school network's NAT. Yeah.

Best, Cameron Whiting, as 137.85.135.181 (talk) 17:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I know.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

you have no regards to my 15 times great grandfather
i have showen you and others facts yet you refuse to see them i have emailed wikipedia myself and showen them this issue and told them that i have tried to add sir edmund farley twice now yet you refuse to see him and add his name to the list that you have already provided About Sir Edmund Farley FARLEY, I have read was the version of FALAISE the French name of the Farley ancestors. However after 1066 and all that, the castle (probably made of timber initially) was part of the domain of Falaise who named the Castle Farley which was his English version of his name. He took the name Farley too.

In a picturesque valley of the river Frome, on the border between Wiltshire and Somerset and nine miles from Bath stands the remains of Farleigh Hungerford Castle. Started in the 14th century it still has much for the visitor to enjoy and provides a great day out for families with children, couples and even walkers enjoying the beautiful surrounding countryside. This fortified mansion was occupied for 300 years by the remarkable Hungerford family and today their intriguing, yet sometimes gruesome stories are told through graphic interpretation panels and a free audio tour. There are many hidden treasures - the chapel with rare medieval wall paintings and family tombs; extensive displays in the Priest’s house; and for those who are brave enough to enter the crypt, there’s the best collection of human-shaped lead coffins in Britain.

Farleigh Hungerford Castle, also called Farleigh Castle or Farley Castle, at Farleigh Hungerford in the civil parish of Norton St Philip, Somerset England was built around 1370. It has been designated as a Grade I listed building and Scheduled Ancient Monument Originally a manor house overlooking the River Frome it was fortified and developed over hundreds of years. It played a role in the English Civil War before falling into ruin. The ruins are now a tourist attraction managed by English Heritage

You have been very rude yourself. As you have a conflict of interest you need to discuss your concerns on the article's talkpage.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Eugene Mc Cabe - Eileen Battersby
The last four adjectives describing and man of literature are "virulently, boorishly, cloacal and invective" are unfair, a matter of opinion and biased. I ask who Added this comment to his Biography? And what gave them the right to make them? I ask that the entire "He defended Dermot Healy by virulently and boorishly attacking the reviewer of his book, Eileen Battersby, in The Irish Times in 2011, using cloacal invective in lieu of argument to describe her own writing." be removed, as it is a matter between Eugene and Eileen, and is not pertinent in a 150 word Bio of an very productive 84 years of life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrickbmccabe (talk • contribs) 20:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

You need to discuss your concerns on the article's talkpage. Katieh5584 (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Katieh5584 the city of Cairns has never had a direct hit of a cyclone, whereas every coastal community north and south has. Many Cairns residents speak the "the cyclones that couldn't bring our house down", however this is far from the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trinitypi (talk • contribs) 13:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

You should have changed the article and provided a source rather than adding your comments.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

No Star for you
How is anything i posted potentially controversial?

You need to provide a source.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

sasy mankan birth day
hello. sasy mankan was born on november 17, 1988 according to this. Mohamadhosein.a (talk) 20:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

You need to add that to the article.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Rome Metro Change
Hi, deleted that article for a good reason. I wrote it under the wrong name, so it wasnt showing under any other links, so I copied and pasted its content to the correct title.

Sorry for the convenince. Staglit (talk) 20:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, no problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Katieh, just remember that when a page author blanks the page, it usually means a deletion request. Consider adding db-author to the page, or use Twinkle and tag it for WP:CSD. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 20:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

I've just done it.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Kate Many thanks for your message, The edited page is my own page which i created an year ago i guess and didn't complete that,i just wanted to remove it and put new text afterward in the next few weeks. Thanks KIAVASH SALIMIAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.23.153 (talk) 22:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Cup of tea!
 A.Minkowiski_Lets t@lk has asked you to join them for a nice cup of tea and sit down here. Take a cup of tea for a while and keep on fighting against vandalism.

Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I added 72 hours of semi-protection on your talk page. Ask me or any other admin to remove if I assumed too much. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124;  WER  21:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:12, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hallelujah. Best vandal fighters get vandalized the most, it looks like. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 05:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Re: File:Frauke Finsterwalder, CK.jpg,
Hello,

Thanks for your message about the file Frauke Finsterwalder, CK.jpg. I was trying to delete the entire entry because I didn't really want the image to be a standalone entry that would be ranked highly in search engine lists, just an illustration for a new entry I'm creating for the German film director Frauke Finsterwalder. Do you know how I can erase the entry/image file altogether? Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giles Harrington (talk • contribs) 08:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Re: Edits on Amador High School
Hello Katie.

Thank you for your kind information about my editing to that page.

I would like to state that certain parts of my edit were made by me at a later date, but were left unsubmitted. I would also like to clarify that I accidentally left my Wikipedia page logged in on a school computer, and that that is where my potential vandalism may have come from. Thanks, and have a great day. --Dxtron (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Lucozade
Hello there.

I asked Lucozade whether Apple and Blackcurrant were discontinued and they confirmed.

They have also disappeared off their website.

BlaBla27 (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Fayston article
Hi, I deleted that part from the Fayston article because it didn't seem to have much to do with the town. It consists of what appears to quotes from somewhere about people during the Civil War, but it's not included in the references section at the bottom of the page. Were these people residents of Fayston? It doesn't say anywhere, and even if they were, it doesn't seem like it fits on the general town page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.39.7.34 (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

UFC article
What I wrote is true, though. If a fight is declared to be a title eliminator, that status will be retroactively cancelled if the fight isn't pleasing to the fans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NerdNinja9 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm NEW!
Hello, I new here so can you help me with things when I need it? TravisFrye (talk) 21:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)TravisFrye, 4/19/2014 @ 5:21 PM

Katie
You removed my edit to Mike Liverpool Dean's page ?

Why?

This is his name.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.9.182 (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

No, it was vandalism.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Volkswagen Golf vandalism
Thank you for reverting 's edits to the Volkswagen Golf article. They didn't stop, so I listed them on WP:RVAN. They seem to have made similar bad-faith edits (changing model dates etc.) to several other automobile-related pages, but unfortunately I do not have time to review them all. DES (talk) 23:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Guess list
Hi Katie, just trying to work out why my link between the Guess List and Blankety Blank caused such offenceRedfoman (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Redfoman

It wasn't that, it was the fact that you wrote your opinion into the article with your later addition.Katieh5584 (talk) 12:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit message
Hi, I got sent a message saying you did an edit of mine but I never made an edit to the Rumba page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.244.142 (talk) 09:28, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

You must be using a shared IP.Katieh5584 (talk) 12:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Rooftopping vandalism claim
this is my explanation in the respective article's discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Roof_and_tunnel_hacking#This_is_not_rooftopping.21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dues Ex Machina (talk • contribs) 13:28, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

edit in Cuntz algebras
I don't like the formulation with "in particular" because it seems to me that the condition S*S=\delta I cannot be recovered witht the first condition.

simply writting "and" is more clear — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.183.206.130 (talk) 13:08, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm gonna change it again tomorrow to let you the time to think — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noix07 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for removing that from my talk page. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 17:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

S jayarama reddy
I don't understand why you removed the page about S Jayarama reddy that I had edited because I think he is a much more notable person than the current one that been put up on the page. You can google 'S Jayarama Reddy Sjr' and see the popularity.

He has made an impact on many peoples lives and his company is one of the biggest ones that is currently present in the real estate development sector in bangalore. You can google sjrgroup.com

Please and thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.5.134.170 (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

You need to create a separate page for him.Katieh5584 (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Rights are the products of promises.
People ask where rights come from and what justifies them. What is clear for example is that all private contract rights are the products of promises. In fact promises serve no other purpose than to create expectations which, if recognized as legally binding in a given jurisdiction, become legal rights in that jurisdiction. In most legal jurisdictions the validity of the right created by a promise is based on: 1. - the performer being the one who made the promise. It's no use if I promise you what Jim will do for you. Jim has to promise you if you are to enjoy the 'right' to expect Jim's performance. 2. - the promise must be realistic; within the capacity of the promiser. There's no right to the expection of a pauper's promise to pay you a million dollars tomorrow. 3. - the promise must be to perform something legal and not illegal.

This, of course, throws doubts on the validity of governments promising rights to some citizens which have to be performed by other citizens or/and all taxpayers.

Meanwhile it clearly explains the basis of the negative freedom rights to life, liberty and property from the tacit promise all peaceful, honest, productive and cooperative - civilized - people signal in body language and polite social manners to each other all day: "I promise I won't harm you if you don't harm me". Of course vested interest politicians who abuse their powers of authority to force some to perform for the benefit of others rarely qualify as peaceful, honest, productive, cooperative or civilized. That's why they are the least trusted profession.

Historically, armies conquered peoples who, being vanquished, had no rights. Some were enslaved and others were conceded some rights by their new masters, say, to keep on producing whatever needed goods or services they always had done. So in continental Europe, where they were endlessly conquering each other, what in the English speaking world are known as Law students, instead study Rechts, Droits, Derechos. The Anglo perspective that Law is to limit harm-to-others changes for a continental perspective of Rights being the only relief from slavery to the despotism of the bureaucracy of conquering sovereign. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.32.24.245 (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Mobile Payment
You have deleted an external link on the Mobile Payment page I inserted to substantiate my addition that a lot of non-banking companies are getting into mobile payment models. Earlier, when I have tried to add text without mentioning the source, people have objected. Now, you have objected when I quoted the source. Please, explain how it works.

Sources need to be reliable and verifiable, blogs are not reliable. Read WP:EXT.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Shakeela Vararajan
Shakeela Vararajan is a resident and a minor celebrity. I do not know why you removed this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.153.66 (talk) 21:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

If they are that much of a celebrity create a page for them.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:55, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry
Im sorry Katie I was trying to advertise my clan it wont happen again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtermina8 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

EXPLAIN HOW ADDING CONTENT IS VANDALISM?
SERIOUSLY, EXPLAIN HOW ADDING CONTENT IS VANDALISM? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PAPL8S (talk • contribs) 22:22, 20 April 2014 (UTC)


 * YELLING won't help. In this case I don't think what is happening is vandalism. Edit warring yes but vandalizing no. I think we have good intentions to change the spelling to a format that the new editor is used to using. It's important to point out that the spelling was correct for the article. I would suggest everyone involved take a dose of WP:AGF here cause I think it's a big misunderstanding all around. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:43, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The edit I did which is referred to on here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:85.5.139.171 and that you've twice undone was because the person's name is incorrect in the article as any simple Google search will prove. How does that count as vandalism or not constructive? Erik — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.5.139.171 (talk) 11:40, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I moved the page to Moira Johnston per the sources. IP user, please keep calm, thank you for pointing it out. Katie, likewise. Hell in a Bucket, I see why Katie did what she did, hopefully all is now sorted. BethNaught (talk) 11:51, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Katieh, thank you for the information and suggestions. I'm new to Wikipedia and still getting familiar with the rules here. Nonetheless, I have no conflict of interest with the articles I edit. Thanks again and regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venezolano2014 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Lee Hong-gi
I dont understand how this is vandalism. It is correcting a mistake by writing what most people know the person as. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.180.101.209 (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The point is that there is no point changing his name in the article without changing the article title, and so doing such is frowned on. If you have good reason to believe his name should be changed, you should make a move request. BethNaught (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

S.L. Benfica
Hi there,

The text that I had edited claimed that Benfica S.L. is the most widely-supported football club in the world. Both of the sources cited by the user who continually edited my posts said that Benfica is the club with the most paid members, and the club with the most members giving financial support. Neither citation had information relevant to the claim, and so I corrected the article numerous times to more accurately display the content of the sources.

The text added by the user, that claims Benfica is the most widely-supported football club in the world, is simply false. There is not a single available, credible source that lists Benfica S.L. as the world's most-supported club. The claim to the contrary should be removed from the article, as there is no evidence to support the claim, and the user who continues to edit it does not understand the content of the sources they are citing. SorenLegatus (talk) 21:04, 22 April 2014 (UTC)


 * That's exactly what support means. 85.247.249.199 (talk) 23:24, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * There is evidence that Benfica is of the clubs with most fans around the world and that Benfica is the Portuguese club with most fans. Now let's go to the point. "Supporter (sports): Someone who is a fan of a certain team or sportsperson". "Member: One who officially belongs to a group". This is all about "member" vs "fan/supporter". 85.247.249.199 (talk) 23:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

This is exactly my point. Do you believe that Benfica has more supporters than Man United? Barcelona? Real Madrid? Chelsea? Those are the current top 4 most supported teams in the world. If those are the top 4, which numerous polls and surveys say that they are, then how can Benfica have the most supporters? Additionally, the first source claims that, in 2006, Benfica had roughly 160,000 "paid-up members." Benfica easily have five times that many supporters, so it's obvious that the citation is not actually talking about the number of fans. It's talking about affiliated members or dues-payers. They definitely have the most in Portugal, and many around the world, but to say they are the most widely supported club is simply not true. The article should show that they are one of the most supported, which is true, or that they have the most members, which is also true. It currently says that they have the most supporters, which is false. SorenLegatus (talk) 00:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Greeks of the Sea TV Documentary Series
Hi Katie,

I have been compiling the above article over the past few weeks, and as a first time user have struggled somewhat with the complexities of putting together a Wikipedia page. It appears to have now been deleted? The article is about a TV Documentary series which has been produced in association with a Government public broadcaster, SBS Australia, which is a sister organisation to the ABC. I have been following other similar TV documentary formats which appear on Wikipedia such as "Britain and the Sea", a BBC production. I sincerely apologise if I have made any errors and would appreciate your advices as to how I can rectify the situation.

Sincerely

Peter Pentz

Pentz.peter (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Digital Innovations
Unfortunately, when you reverted the additions made by the company, you made the matter worse--the changes they made on April 21 and 23 removed promotional wording that had previously been present & did some grammar fixes. Both of these are permitted. The only thing wrong there is the user name, which I will deal with. Dealing with coi users can sometimes be complicated,and I might easily have done just what you did, more or less as a reflex.  DGG ( talk ) 17:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, sorry about that.Katieh5584 (talk) 17:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

4/23/14
Hi Katie - I'm trying to learn how to suggest a page be written with declared COI. I am new to wikipedia, and am creating a draft page in my sandbox and learning how to go about this correctly as suggested by Amatulić (below)

I have declined the speedy deletion nomination and removed the tag. Your user page is a legitimate disclosure of your conflict of interest. Please review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for guidance on the best way for editors with a conflict of interest to conduct themselves on Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

I'll add that Wikipedia:Articles for creation is the best venue for an editor with a conflict of interest to submit an article. If you decide to do that, your submission should conform to the requirements summarized in WP:42 before it will be accepted, and it must not contain any text that has been published elsewhere. (Even if you have the authority to reproduce copyright text, Wikipedia doesn't, and user accounts cannot grant that authority.) ~Amatulić (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Andrea at Clean Production Action (talk) 18:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

My Apoligy
Look i'm really sorry about that--Hacienda Guy (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Hacienda Guy

Speedy deletion declined: User:Andrea at Clean Production Action/sandbox/Clean Production Action
Hello Katieh5584, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Andrea at Clean Production Action/sandbox/Clean Production Action, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please don't WP:BITE the newbies, even if they have a COI. The user is "doing it right" by their username, and that sandbox had nothing promotional about it. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:15, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Annelie Whitfield
Hello Katieh5584, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Annelie Whitfield, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Reverting on BLP's
Hi there,

Please be a smidgen more careful when reverting large scale removal of content from BLP's. Your revert at Can Ergenekan actually restored a whole paragraph worth of BLP violations. While you were correct that it was unexplained and they should have used an edit summary, new users (and especially the subjects of articles) often don't know these things, but this doesn't make their removal of BLP-violating content any less correct. Taking a moment to slow down and review the content you're restoring, especially on BLP articles, is my recommendation.

Regards, Daniel (talk) 00:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, about that. I will be more careful in future.Katieh5584 (talk) 09:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Wgolf. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nina Iskrenko, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 17:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC) Person appears to be notable-I put her on my watchlist to see what happens-it looks like it needs more info. (Same thing just happened with a article I just put a speedy on that might be notable-Elif sultan.) Wgolf (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!
No, problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 18:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

K. Brander
Some joker keeps changing the page to a bunch of nonsense. I just want to revert it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenTorah (talk • contribs) 19:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

KT Syndrome
I mad the edit because recently, the "Weber" has been dropped from Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome in order to avoid confusion with the similar Sturge-Weber Syndrome. As you can also see, the K-T Support Group and most other groups only use "Klippel-Trenaunay".

http://www.sturge-weber.org/resources/about-sws/conditions/17-klippel-trenaunay-syndrome.html k-t.org

Also, I have K-T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.80.66.50 (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Another Barnstar
Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 08:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Artist Sheila Elias
Sheila Elias's birth date is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.115.38.206 (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

There are lots of sites which state she was born in 1945.Katieh5584 (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Nothing is okay it seems?
Hi there,

I am the web managing editor for the organization's page and have written most of the content on that page and can easily source to that page. Since it seems nothing is going to be okay with Wikipedia's guidelines, I give up. Thank you.

-KCorder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcorder (talk • contribs) 19:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 19:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Hillsborough talk page
This is also being discussed at WP:ANI this is what I said there:


 * "Another change but he's left the topic collapsed so I suggest we leave this one be and see what happens next. If he doesn't leave the talk page alone then further reverts and semi-protection would be the way to go."

I may be being hopeful, but I've a feeling that if we let this current edit go he'll leave it at that. And since the subject is collapsed, letting it go doesn't make a lot of difference. Thanks for your help, regardless. 2.25.115.116 (talk) 21:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Suzannah lipscomb
I don't understand why I can't add someone's date of birth, because another user cites it is not a reliable source, whilst this other user feels their sources are reliable? Who can make this decision? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lw1982 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:RS.Katieh5584 (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Unsure how to refrence
I'm very new to wikipedia, and i've recently posted something on the secret saturdays being a message to fans about how to revive the show. I have confirmation from the creator of the show but i am extremely unsure how to reference to a conversation between me and the creator of the show (I deleted information for this post because i wrote this before i made an account but my username is NicolangeloLeone)
 * You can't include it in the page as it would be Original Research which Wikipedia doesn't allow.Katieh5584 (talk) 11:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Nizamabad
Hello why are you undoing my edits from the page(Nizamabad) there is no reference for info which is already existing in it so let me correct it, by the way I am providing you the reference.
 * Are you talking to me? nicolangeloleone

Thanks
for dealing with the latest sock on Dave Snowden Snowded  TALK 00:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 09:55, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Help
Hi Katieh5584, can you help me please to change my nick name in english wikipedia to: محمد بوعلام عصامي«Md.Boualam»

Could you please check that for me. Thank you for your precious help and guidance.--محمد بوعلام عصامي (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

FYI
.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

My edit
I'm not sure why you removed my edit to Martin (name) citing it as not constructive. It may not be to you but it was to me. Just so I can understand, why did you remove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.11.229.242 (talk) 20:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I reverted your edit because you can't add yourself to the article.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

ANI notice regarding 173.176.42.17
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continuous addition of weakly sourced controversial content by IP. Thank you. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

hello
hello katie :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.39.137.134 (talk) 11:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

My edits about Smith Electric
Hi Katieh5584, thank you for your advice about edits to the various references to the Smith Electric pages. I work for Smith and I am just cleaning up some inaccurate information. I hope that you agree my edits are clean, unbiased and heavily referenced.

I will work hard to ensure that I dont break the rules.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmithElectric (talk • contribs) 16:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

regrding Pravin Togadia
HI Katieh5584, the changes I have made was on the basis of last profile view, he is currently working as "Hindu Extremist" that's why I have changed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llvllrcool (talk • contribs) 16:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about the false information, my friends are stupid and i was away from my laptop and they typed in the false information, and obviously they did it again because i got a message saying i was warned, if you could find who ever else sent me a message and clear it up i would appreciate it.

sorry
Sorry about the false information, my friends are stupid and i was away from my laptop and they typed in the false information, and obviously they did it again because i got a message saying i was warned, if you could find who ever else sent me a message and clear it up i would appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.138.183.240 (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello Katieh5584. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. The artilce was only created one minute before you tagged it, wait a bit before you tag pages or use   :P TheMesquito (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ( almost . (t) Josve05a  (c) 21:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC) )
 * I did not know about that, Whoops! Sorry !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMesquito (talk • contribs) 21:34, 28 April 2014
 * No problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

help me
my page was just reverted to the old inaccurate page. I corrected the page someone set up for me and just edited the format of a couple of books. I am not sure how to use this system. Gerald Weeks 131.216.14.2 (talk) 14:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)4/27/14

User:Moriah-Torchlight
I just declined this speedy - it was certainly not promotional, and for all we know it could be a valid declaration of COI. Please be more careful with your tagging. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

My Article
Hello Katieh5584, I am sorry for accidentally posting my article before it was done. I am not sure how to take back that article to draft mode. Can you please help me with this? It would be all the more better if you or someone else could write an unbiased article about OfficeTimer.com for me. I am willing to bear any charges if involved.

I keep using Wikipedia a lot but I have never written any article or contributed much in any other form except for making a donation sometimes. I really would like to make a contribution in terms of article writing etc once I go through the learning curve of using Wikipedia.

Regards, Sri SrinathRamOT (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Viasat Pages
Hi Katieh5584,

We're new to Wikipedia and are currently updating new logos for the Viasat factual channels on behalf of the Viasat company. I was wondering why you changed the logos back on the Viasat Nature/Crime page? We would like to make the page appear with new and old logos in the same way as the Viasat History page. Please explain if we are doing something wrong? Thanks!CentralPressLondon (talk) 11:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Usernames
Hi Katie. I saw that you got rebuked at WP:UAA, so I thought I could pass along some of my experience on how best to handle problem usernames. I hope this helps - it took me a while to understand the procedures. Keep up the good work! --Drm310 (talk) 05:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No edit history whatsoever - Definitely not material for UAA - we can't admonish them on suspicion alone. If they are an obvious match to a company or organization but have not made any edits at all, then you could leave them a uw-username warning.
 * Only WP:AFC submissions - The UAA admins won't block these on sight. However if they are an obvious WP:COI, either writing about themselves or something they represent, a uw-coi-username warning is appropriate.
 * Edits in main article space or user space - These are reportable to UAA and will get whacked with the big hammer.
 * Thanks for the advice.Katieh5584 (talk) 07:26, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

edits
Thank you Katie for your advise on Edit Summary page. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgie lennon8705 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion contesting
I removed your deletion notice on user talk:Lucreziabonna because it was not a biography.--75* 17:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Snowland
Actually, the account exists. It was created in 2006 but has never edited at all. I've taken the page to MfD Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Snowland as it appears to be a 'hijack'... Your comments would be welcome there. Peridon (talk) 20:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I used this username because it is for a group class project at UW. Will that be okay? My teacher instructed us to do so.

User:FResearchGroup
I do not understand why you need to delete User:FResearchGroup. Please help me understand, what our mistake was.

Since the user account is blocked I use my other personal account to contact you. I am a German linguist working mostly with Sami languages and adding encyclopedic information to relevant articles. I write in different language versions of Wikipedia, but at present mostly in German. You can easily check my contributions to Wikipedia.

Recently, I opened a new user account at Commons under the name commons:user:FResearchGroup (see the short explanation there). We wanted to use this account for our whole research group to upload media originating from our work. We thought that we could also use this account for writing as a group in Wikipedia. Popularization of the results of our research we consider an important part of our professional work. Therefore we do not need to write anonymously, we thought. That is why I provided the link to the project webpage at our university. To let other users know who we are.

If you find this blatant advertisement, please tell us before you block and delete. If these kinds of links are not allowed (we are sorry, be we did not know) we are happy to take it away again.

--Michael.riessler (talk) 14:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * English Wikipedia's username policy states that account names can never represent a group of people or an organization, and an account can never be shared between different people. Accounts can only ever represent and be used by a single individual. The rules at Commons appear to be different, which is why I can understand your confusion. I am sorry to say that each member of your group will require their own Wikipedia account if they don't wish to edit anonymously. Best of luck. --Drm310 (talk) 18:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for helping me understand the problem. What I still do not understand is why my account (and even my IP address) is blocked. The username policy states: "administrators should examine the user's edits to decide whether or not to allow them to create a new username […] Users who adopt such usernames, but who are not editing problematically in related articles, should not be blocked. Instead, they should be gently encouraged to change their username." Since so far it was me (i.e. Michael.riessler) alone who used the new group account and there were no promotional editing done whatsoever (except that I "promoted" my real identity on my own user page), I kindly ask you to give me the opportunity to change my username. In the future I will follow the rules and not share this account with other individuals. Thank you! --Michael.riessler (talk) 19:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately I am not an administrator, nor is Katie5584, and it's beyond either of our power to grant your request. You should direct your inquiry to the admin who blocked the account, . He may provide you with a clearer explanation of why he blocked the account, and grant you an opportunity to submit a change of username. I hope you get a satisfactory resolution. --Drm310 (talk) 20:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I left a message at Michael.riessler's talk page to see if we can get this fixed. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:32, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Suzannah Lipscomb
Sorry, but it is up to us--that's what makes us editors, not robotic aggregators of factoids. It's "well-sourced" if by that you mean that there is something that seems to prove that it is true, but "well-sourced" should really mean that it is sourced reliably and independently--if only to determine that it is a factoid worth inclusion, because a secondary source has remarked on it. I'm somewhat surprised you let yourself get dragged up to a third revert on such a minor matter, but I'm sure you won't let that happen again. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 00:47, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, you're right. I shouldn't have got caught up in it, it won't happen again.Katieh5584 (talk) 09:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mapua Mansion
Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mapua Mansion, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to houses. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

 * Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 10:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:TeenTV
Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:TeenTV, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not promotional, no external links, user has other contributions. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I've also declined your speedy request here because this is perfectly legitimate content for userspace. Instead, I'd suggest that you help this new user to move the content to her userpage. Let's be nice to the newbies, please. :-) Risker (talk) 05:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok,sorry. They were both mistakes.Katieh5584 (talk) 10:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Pramila Nesargi
Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pramila Nesargi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Punjab College Okara
Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Punjab College Okara, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Template messages
You may want try methods of communication other than the default template messages a little more often. For example, here the user actually tried to reply and talk to you, only to be answered by more standard templates. Answering his questions and explaining why the images were inappropriate might have helped end the escalation (and the edit war). Another example would be User talk:Manvender Singh Rathore (Mvndr4u); I'm not sure what that user is aiming for, and it may well be inappropriate for Wikipedia, but I doubt yet more default templates will resolve the issue. Huon (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I'm not very good at communicating as I'm autistic.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Just thought I'd drop by and leave my 2 ¢. Katie, I very much understand how Autism can make it difficult to communicate effectively, but it would be very beneficial for both you and others to see how you can work on your communication skills if they're something you struggle with. Ask if you have any questions. I'm willing to help if need be. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 03:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Or me. I'm on the spectrum as well. Meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 03:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Phill24th. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Satin creditcare network ltd, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Phill24th (talk) 17:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Dearest Katieh 5584 I submitted my article written with great effort,i spent three months to collect the history of Hazrat syed sakhi Zain ul Abideensultan sarwar(father of a sufi saint Sahki Sarwar).I have uploaded the images of the shrine with same title.But unfortunately you put the deletion tag on it.What i assume and think,its a requirement of millions of devotees visiting the shrine of sufi saint Sahki Sarwar from all over the world.Because this history is not present on any site,hence i choose your site to publish it for the history lovers.I am much too desperate my heart is broken,its my fifth attempt for this title.No problem,you may be blessed with the blessings of the almighty God.Your site be flourished meeting the challenge of the time.I am a person with bad luck,i should be humiliate more and more on this planet,that may be suitable for me. Regretting inconvenience and thanking your grace. Mohammad Azmat3687Azam (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop editing the Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety page, the section you are adding is not needed.
 * You have a conflict of interest and shouldn't be editing it.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:06, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety edits
The section "Background" is not needed and full of suppositions that cannot be verified or proven. Adding statements like "The agreement was signed by Primark, Loblaw, Bonmarché (reluctantly)" is not a provable statement. You can't know if they reluctantly signed or not.

The section is based on biased opinion and should be removed to maintain fairness and balance. Afbws (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)AFBWS
 * I replied to your email to OTRS, please follow the instructions I provided there. That's especially true if you have a conflict of interest in relation to the subject. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:49, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Things written in Foreign
I've deleted the Rifat one - it was in Turkish (a good clue was the words Ankara and Tűrk near the start). And the word 'resume' in the blogspot URL gave a very good clue that A7 would be involved... The other one is Arabic and in translation it looks odd - coherent but I can't see the meaning. I've tagged it as Arabic. A tip: if not sure what language things are, drop a few words into Google Search in quotes. That way you often pick up a copyvio. Or use Google Translate first - 'detect language' setting. If that doesn't work, try G search without quotes and look at the national domains of sites - with luck, you might pick up a Wikpedia page in the language. All of us that work PNT regularly use tricks like these and act casually as though we speak all the languages. You get to spot things - an ı (i with no dot) has to be a Turkic language and likely will be Turkish or Northern Azeri; loads of x and w and double vowels is Somali; Arabic looking things will be Arabic, Farsi or less often Urdu; stuff that looks as if it's written mirror fashion with loads of w u and q is Armenian; and so on. It's quite good fun being a language detective. Peridon (talk) 17:05, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tips.Katieh5584 (talk) 17:06, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

A couple of things
One - if a page author has blanked the page, and they are the main contributor (i.e. all the others have been tags, typos or gnomish things), don't revert them. Just tag G7. The other is U5. This is really for the fantasy football tables, things that are very obviously CVs (resumés if you're on the wrong side of the pond...), and ranting. Things that look like articles (or someone completely new's idea of an article) probably are draft (not Draft:) articles and should be left (unless attack, copyvio, hoax or spam...). If they've been there for a long time, yes, tag them or MfD as FAKEARTICLE. If they're fresh, give them some chance to grow, and contact the author to see if they need help. A lot do start articles on their user page instead of on a subpage. If they say it's finished, ask about moving it into article space. If not, keep an eye on it. Peridon (talk) 19:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 19:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

U5 again
Hi Katieh5584. I've just declined your U5 tag on User talk:ChristinaAklein. Please don't use U5 for deleting userpages unless there's no conceivable way that the content could be relevant to Wikipedia. In this instance, the user was trying to ask a question about an article, which is a perfectly valid use of their talkpage. Your work with the other speedy deletion tags is pretty exemplary, but this one seems to be tripping you up - it might be worth re-reading the criterion. Yunshui 雲 水 07:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 16:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

User talk:A delicious pot pie
Please be careful with things like these. Editors are free to remove most of the stuff from their talk pages, with few exceptions. In fact, the removal serves as a "read receipt" of sorts. They are not required to reply to you (or even the SPI). You need to be less fixated on these types of things. These series of edits don't fall under vandalism or BLP reverts in any way and can cause you to be blocked for 3RR. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Para-Researcher Avijit
Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Para-Researcher Avijit, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)