User talk:Katierstice/sandbox

Katie's Peer Review
Your edits are clear and structured and are neutral. I like how you added a specific example of the way companies have used internet bots. I'd suggest continuing with examples of internet bots used to market. Also, maybe keep some of the existing the last paragraph under "Commercial uses" that you have removed. Overall, I liked your edits.Emmas2746 (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Second Peer Review
Your draft is very clear. It has lots of useful. yet neutral, information. I would suggest using more refrences and citationd throughout the draft to make it more credible. SierraMichelle (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Article Draft
Katie, Your article draft seems thorough and I like that it's balanced. All of your sources are online sources, and I wonder if nothing was available from the databases--they would be more trustworthy. I don't know enough about the sources you've used to know whether they would be biased. Aside from this minor concern, your draft is good. There are a few mechanical errors, though.JAirhart 19:08, 25 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airhartcomp (talk • contribs)