User talk:KatoYR

September 2022
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 08:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear Editor, MrOllie. Have you work in MicroRNA? I have been working about microRNA from my discovery to miRNA code decoding for 40 years. What is authorizing?You, editors are correct absolutely?Deleting my editing at four times by the great Editors is violation at four times, I think. If you can edit Wiki, it means you have ignored the published evidence. And PubMed papers are not all. Look at PubMed. There is lots papers in Chinese, not in English. And there is many discovery stories in the world, which have not known. Therefore, I described 'not C.elegans story'. Wiki should have taught to users what it is not known. The Wiki is not the place where the editor is a king. If at this time, my editing will be deleted, I recognized 'Wiki is fake' and talk to everyone, recently people starts to say the same word. This is a turning point of Wiki. Do not forget it. KatoYR (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * See WP:COI. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself, your work, or otherwise engage in self promotion, especially not be attempting to edit war in references to yourself. MrOllie (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear Editor, MeOllie. Thank you for your Great reply. But you are lots wrong. (1) You, The EDITOR started 'Edit War' like Russian President. People has a right to encounter. I do not like 'WAR'. You should stop it. (2) Wiki represents personal biography. Who wrote it? If Editor can delete scientific published data from Wiki, you should understand that 'Wiki is not a place for you king Editor to write about Editor-self. (3) What is self promotion? Basically, science is established by a selfish reports published. Therefore, in paper, 'I' is not be used but 'we' is used. (4) Whoever has a right to edit Wiki, that is not distinguished from self or not-self. For example, VA's discovery, you edited in Wiki about microRNA (miRNA). Is it correct? (1) His discovered miRNA is complete pairing. In general, miRNAs were paired incompletely. Therefore, his discovery is very similar to 'RNA interference' (2) His miRNA targets only one mRNA of C.elegans. Generally miRNA can target multiple mRNAs. (3)  So, the function of his miRNA is really related with only development for C.elegans? Since we have proved that the miRNA function is information-based function like 'messenger' RNA, that is different from structure-based protein function, miRNA has multiple functions. (4) C.elegans did not have cancer. So, his discovery is C.elegans specific. Finally, his discovery in a microRNA discovery section is built up quite incomplete proofs of scientific evidence. Not by CellScienceNature, is decided the value of discovery. Why did you delete such sections?Of course,  I cannot do it. Because it is a part of a miRNA discovery story. Published data deletion by the editor is real self promotion, isn't it?I just wrote published data as a part of a miRNA discovery story according to God of science. Not self-promotion absolutely, sorry!What you want to protect? Money?Pride?Authority?I lost every things by my miRNA scientific publishing by my pocket money, I lost laboratory equipments, grant money, pride and then resigned University, so University post as well. But lots journal editors helped me. If you want to claim my edited portion, please claim each scientific journal Editor. People can understand who is mad, you, Wiki editor or me? In addition, you have deleted a section of Alzheimer's disease and beta-amyloid? Lots of retractions are there. Why not done?CellScienceNature is true?Do not matter about miRNA section. It takes time to establish what is discovery. Therefore, until miRNA code decoding I have stayed to edit a miRNA discovery section. So, I have done now and near future go to heaven (maybe hell). That's it.  In past, an iPS cells discoverer said 'miRNA is fake' because it is C.elegans specific subject. Now I can say, iPS cell is scientific fake because iPS cell is carcinogenic. But I cannot delete a section of iPS cells because that is a part of scientific scenes. Where is edit war happen? So, 'The edit war' was happened by The King Editor like Russian President.This is the end of discussion because your reply is not theory-based one but emotional.'War' enthusiast does not have any ear and eye, so sad reality in human society. KatoYR (talk) 03:15, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * So, back my description by yourself. This is the last caution. I am not concern. MeOllie kills open wiki and open Science. MeOllie behavior is ashamed to AV's C.elegans work. It has been valued as C.elegans specific RNA interference forever by MeOllie deletion, as described above. Science of God upset. Never forget it. If you do not want, you stay within MeOllie's narrow wiki world. MeOllie need not open wiki. -Over. KatoYR (talk) 08:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)