User talk:Katsushi

Welcome
Hello, Katsushi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Dusart
I wanted to let you know that I re-added the Pierre Dusart formula to the article Prime number theorem. You said that the result is not proved in the paper, and you may be right -- I haven't read that paper for a while. But the result is in the paper, and it is proved in Dusart's thesis. The thesis is in his native French, but if you can wade through the table of contents you'll find the right section easily enough. It's formula-dense, so it's almost language independent.

Dusart was kind enough to send me his thesis by email when I asked him some questions that were answered by it, but you'll find that it's online now:. Cheers, and happy editing!

CRGreathouse (t | c) 23:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dyson's transform
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dyson's transform, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Accurate, but gives neither a real source, nor evidence of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

You may be blocked
Hello Katsushi. It has been suggested at Wikipedia talk:WPM that you are a sockpuppet of User:WAREL. Your recent revert at Riemann hypothesis is evidence of edit warring against consensus, which is one of the trademarks of WAREL. If you choose not to respond, it is possible that you will be blocked indefinitely. Please join the discussion if you have anything to say. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Sock of WAREL
__NOINDEX__ Per a discussion at WT:WPM. EdJohnston (talk) 06:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)