User talk:Katsuya1234

Welcome!
Hello, Katsuya1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Katie Walder, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Unspecified source/license for File:Katie Walder 2014-01-19 16-16.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Katie Walder 2014-01-19 16-16.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 21:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Katiewalder 136.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Katiewalder 136.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

August 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Katie Walder. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. After the good work of Yngvadottir, your edits removed reliable sources, valid wikilinks, added a fan site, removed the list of references, etc. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hi
Hi, I got your mail but I'm confused I reverted the random edits back to an earlier version that gave the DOB as "October 13, 1982" as it currently is then you say you were born "Oct 13, 1982" in the email. Please also note our Conflict of interest guidelines. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Gotcha, thank you so much!! I didn't realize you had actually fixed what somebody (a vandal) had incorrectly put on here - have a wonderful day!! I appreciate it :) best, Katie W
 * Please do not remove tags about yourself as you have now identified, the best way to get the notability tab removed is to have more references from "reliable sources that are independent of the topic". If you would like help considering your WP:COI I would suggest asking at Teahouse. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 23:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)