User talk:Katthrynfw

Welcome!
Hello, Katthrynfw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Loral Langemeier did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Your recent editing history at Loral Langemeier shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

I am not in an edit war. I did not repeatedly change it. I got feedback that my info was not sourced so I fixed it. If the "repeatedly changing" comment comes from the fact that there were multiple changes it is because a chunk of my text disappeared every time I tried to add the source. Then when I saved, it all appeared back again.

How is it that if I get info directly from a government site and even include the link both times, and add none ofy own info to it, I am posting setting unsourced? This woman stole 60,000 from my mother and I could have given all the details about how she did it but THAT is hearsay Please treat me with respect in that I am trying to add critical information based on a factual post by the government so others can know who she really is.

If you meant "please don't post negative things about this woman" then reposting would have been ab edit war. Since I thought you gave me feedback on what I did wrong, I fixed it. Might you fix it for me since I have now included the link? Katthrynfw (talk) 23:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)