User talk:Katutubongpeminista

Class?
Are you part of a PhD class? Your edits are essay-like in nature (or unatributed quotations??) and the reference format is not correct. Hence reversed. Please direct your instructor to Education_program. It looks like you guys have missed out on some orientation and such. David notMD (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. Yes, we are a PhD class and it is our first time to engage in Wikipedia. We understand your instruction. We will make our own words and cite references as often as we can. There are more than 10 people in our class so we agreed to make edits to Communication Planning by adding only two sentences maximum using our own words and citing reference(s) per sentence. Wikipedia is a different and enlightening experience for us now. We hope you will not see the multiple simultaneous editing as spam. However we will keep our edits to a minimum. This experience teaches us more respect for Wikipedia now, especially that some of us are college/university professors. Thank you for this experience. Katutubongpeminista (talk) 07:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 11:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Mr. Ollie. I will try to ask for page protection. Katutubongpeminista (talk) 13:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Communication Planning (January 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Communication Planning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Communication_Planning Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mattdaviesfsic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Communication_Planning reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Communication Planning
Hello, Katutubongpeminista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Communication Planning, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Communication Planning


Hello, Katutubongpeminista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Communication Planning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)