User talk:Katyabbott

International Society of Glass Beadmakers (ISGB)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of International Society of Glass Beadmakers (ISGB), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.isgb.org/info/about/about.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of International Society of Glass Beadmakers (ISGB)
A tag has been placed on International Society of Glass Beadmakers (ISGB) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ged UK (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * A crude copy&paste from another website is pure idleness and not the way to make Wikipedia articles. But in this case, even if you wrote the article in your own words, I would be dubious about whether the Society would be deemed notable. (See also this re multiple postings.) &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)