User talk:Katycakes11/Robert E Lee blvd

After analyzing this article in which the author has composed, there were many strengths in which I identified as well as a couple of weaknesses. For beginners, the article does consist of a strong lead section. The lead section does give spectators a hint in which the article will be covering the topic of Robert E. Lee Blvd. The led section also contains some strong bits of info that help correspond with the rest of the article as well. The article is very neutral, in which it is not bias or persuasive. This article's greatest strength is its' numerous amount of sources, which are very reliable and supportive. For the weaknesses, the article needs to be proofread again in which there are a couple of grammatical errors. Lastly, the last section involving entertainment only talks about the Greek festival. It needs to include more about the bars and restaurants in which the author indicates in the section's title. JouBurkeC (talk) 05:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

I peer reviewed your article.This article is off to a great start and has much potential. It's only a draft but with small things such as more sources, more sections about the topic and overall more coverage, it can be a great article.Kambeau (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft Feedback
Make sure you take a look at the report by the Renaming Commission. It has some good info on this street. You should also consider a section on Allen Touissant for whom they want to rename the street. As we discused in class, having one full paragraph that simply summarizes another source is not a great way to incorporate research. There are plenty of sites out there with information about Robert E. Lee. See if you can synthesize the ideas of several into one more fluid paragraph. Then do the same for Allen Touissant. The Greek Festival paragraph is a good example of that kind of synthesis I was talking about in class.

JT: (talk) 21:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)