User talk:Kausalmalladi

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 21:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G N Srinivasa Prasanna concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G N Srinivasa Prasanna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/G N Srinivasa Prasanna


Hello Kausalmalladi. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "G N Srinivasa Prasanna".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Username Needed. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jayanthi Kumaresh seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &#91;Username Needed&#93; 12:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

About my edit
It is indeed a neutral point of view. You may refer to her website for her achievements. Also the place change is to be there. She is based out of Bengaluru Kausal Malladi (talk) 12:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DrJK-hiRes-2017.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DrJK-hiRes-2017.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 18:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Bombay Jayashri, Vani Mahal (Chennai), December 2017.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bombay Jayashri, Vani Mahal (Chennai), December 2017.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bombay Jayashri. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 00:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bombay Jayashri, Vani Mahal (Chennai), December 2017.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bombay Jayashri, Vani Mahal (Chennai), December 2017.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 21:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Bombay Jayashri, you may be blocked from editing. Geniac (talk) 21:09, 1 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Can you please help me understand what is wrong with the text changes I am trying to make? I am unable to find any issues in the info and I have quoted several online resources as well. I have not written any own commentary and just wrote what the general public know Bombay Jayashri as. Please help me understand or point my mistake with an example. It helps. Thank you. KausalMalladi 11:20, 2 August 2019 (IST)


 * Please see WP:PUFFERY. Phrases such as "groomed under the guidance of legend" are puffery. "under the tutelage of" is not encyclopedic language. What does that mean? --Geniac (talk) 22:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Noted, with thanks. "ABC was under the tutelage of XYZ " means the person ABC learnt from XYZ. It is a common language used in India. Anyways, I am now updating the article keeping in mind your suggestions. Please advise. Thanks. KausalMalladi 11:00, 5 August 2019 (IST)