User talk:Kaushambi2017

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. This article is highly problematic. I've already blocked two editors, one for persistent spamming, and the other as sock puppet of the first. I note that you have made no edits at all to any Wikipedia articles, and that you have, correctly, declared a conflict of interest.

One problem with COI editors is that they often find it difficult to write neutrally about the company that is paying them. That's a particular problem when you have no editing history here, so you may not have the skills yet to write a neutral article from scratch. I'm not going to unprotect the article title. I suggest instead that you do a draft here. Let me know when you have done so and I'll look to see if it meets our standards sufficiently to be moved to article space.

Please read the following:
 * You must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management.
 * References should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * You must provide verifiable facts about the company to show how it meets the notability criteria. The previous versions were all just promoting the company and what it sells. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * It must not be written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article text, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spam links to affiliated sites.
 * No text or images can be copied from anywhere else. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

You are correct to have declared your conflict of interest, otherwise it's likely that I would have blocked your account before you had got very far. You are, nevertheless, very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. As an alternative to writing an article yourself, if, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your company is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest.

Before attempting to write an article again, read what I have written above. Please make sure that the company meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)