User talk:Kaverijha23

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Kaverijha23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Hyderabad, India. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  The Mi ke  •Wassup doc?  13:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Random edit summaries
Why do some of your edit summaries bear little relation to your edits? You removed line breaks in the article's main body and labeled the edit "infobox". You removed two paragraphs of info with the edit summary "NO SUCH TEMPLATE REQUIRED". Maybe you don't know what a template or an infobox is? Overall your edits to Rakta Charitra were not as destructive as I thought they were going to be. But I would offer this advice: DON'T SHOUT ALL THE TIME IN YOUR EDIT SUMMARIES (using all capital letters is interpreted as shouting) and make your edit summaries better reflect what you're doing in the edits! Thanks. AtticusX (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Page protection
You can request page protection here: Requests for page protection

Persistant vandalism is generally required before protection is granted, I am not sure the threshold is met on this article. A request to semi protect articles for all telagu actors would not be granted. Active Banana    (bananaphone  19:17, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

In addition, it is in part you that is making a bad edit too: WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers clearly says not to use rowspan. Please fix your mistake. DMacks (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Kindly stop edit warring and use the talk page if you disagree on something. You have reverted everything, edited as you wish sourced information and added unsourced info. If you continue that way, I'll have to file a report against you. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  20:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Please revert your edits because they are not correct and use the talk page. Your behaviour is most disruptive and will not be taken lightly. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  20:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Filmfare Awards. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 20:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Article talk page
Per your edit summary that you dont know how to use talk pages, click on the "discussion" tab at the top of the article page, it will take you here: Talk:Filmfare Awards where you can initiate or respond to the appropriate conversation. Active Banana    (bananaphone  20:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Specifically, the conversation has begun at: Talk:Filmfare_Awards. Active Banana    (bananaphone  20:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring and name calling
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Filmfare Awards. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Active  Banana    (bananaphone  20:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * In addtion, your comments such as [] are not appropriate. Treat other editors civilly and do not make random accusations of "pupperty". Active Banana    (bananaphone  20:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nakon 20:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Due to your clear block evasion via an IP address, I have reset your block and extended it to 3 days; your block now expires 3 days from now. You are advised that any further evasion of your block may lead to you being indefinitely blocked. Regards, –MuZemike 21:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Reply
Although you started messaging me while evading a block, I'll reply. First, I know who you are and we have already been in a disagreement once on the National Film Awards pages. In this case, if both Filmfare and Filmfare South are given by The Times Group, then it can be mentionedin an article about The Times Group. The article on Filmfare Awards should have info only about them, and not the South awards. A separate article about the Southern awards already exists, and that's where info about them actually belongs.

Also, no one says Filmfare is the equivalent of the Oscars. We say it is referred to as such, which is sourced to reliable sources. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  21:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Halo
&mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Do not remove declined unblock requests from your talk page, if you continue to do so, your talk page rights will be removed. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

request edit continued

 * After reviewing the IP information and the computers used, I have a very hard time believing they are not you. TN X Man  16:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)