User talk:Kawkaba

Welcome!

Hello, Kawkaba, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! — Ed! (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Falcon8765 (talk) 20:11, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Nobel Peace Prize. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tomas e (talk) 10:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC) Thanks, I will add sources Kawkaba (talk) 05:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The sources you added were not up to the standards for Wikipedia article. See WP:V for more details. In particular, that petition site is not a good source. Note that Peres is still alive, and thusewhatever we say about him must comply with another policy: WP:BLP. Further, there's an article specifically about controversies: Nobel Prize controversies. That article has a section devoted to the prizes of Peres, Arafat, and Rabin. That section shouldn't be given excess weight compared to other controversies, but there's probably room for an additional line or two if you can find adequate sources.   Will Beback    talk    21:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * To add to that, refer to WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:POV. Wikipedia is not a forum for gathering signatures for petitions. Tomas e (talk) 18:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ka Pat Number
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ka Pat Number, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 19:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

But can I put in reference a book published in arabic and that has no Internet reference? Kawkaba (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I have declined the speedy deletion nomination on this, as that is only for blatant hoaxes; but I have put on a hoax tag. Note that the tag says only that the content might be a hoax. The tag puts it into a category which may bring other editors in who are able to help. I am sorry to seem suspicious, but Wikipedia suffers greatly from plausible-looking hoaxes, and WP:Verifiability, "whether readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true" is one of our most important policies. I have posted a note at Wikiproject Mathematics to see if anyone there can help.
 * I have also "moved" the article to Ka Pat number (lower-case "n") which is our capitalisation convention. The old title redirects to it. JohnCD (talk) 20:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ka Pat number
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ka Pat number, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Erpert (let's talk about it) 22:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)