User talk:Kaydots

June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of LGBT characters in television and radio. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. --  Alex TW 05:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

List of LGBT characters in television and radio
Hi. I'm an administrator on Wikipedia. An editor wrote on my talk page that you've been blanking content on List of LGBT characters in television and radio. There's a talk page discussion at Talk:List of LGBT characters in television and radio. Please contribute there instead of communicating with editors through edit summaries and reverts. It's difficult to establish consensus when only one editor is willing to talk. You may believe that characters don't belong on the list, but this has to be resolved through discussion and consensus, not edit warring. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of LGBT characters in television and radio, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 21:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

That word
Hello. Please consider avoiding using the word "queer" as a catch-all phrase in edit summaries, as you did here. With people who explicitly identify as queer—or, in the case of fictional works, with characters who are explicitly identified as queer—it's acceptable, but "unlabeled...characters", as you put it, are best not described using that word. The term is still widely considered an epithet, and it can be counterproductive to use it casually. Alternatives include "LGBT" or more specific terms, in cases where specificity is possible. Thanks. Rivertorch  FIRE WATER   21:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)