User talk:KaylaSankovich

Welcome!
Hello, KaylaSankovich, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Article Church of Colònia Güell Peer Review
Peer review

Link to draft you're reviewing: Church of Colònia Güell

Lead

Few changes have been done to the Lead. It does include the introductory sentence. However, the information in it might have been more precise in defining what the subject is. The section goes through most of the major points of the article, but it also contains some non-neutral information that is not explained: "...was a famous architect, and rightfully so". The reference link seems to be out of place, making the last piece of information lacking in sources.

Content

The added content is up-to-date. However, some contributions, like mentioning that the church was a place of worship "on a hill side", are self-evident and, thus, of little importance. The article lacks a general description of the building - the details of construction are scattered in-between point on history. As a result, the reader might struggle to obtain a clear picture of what the building looks like.

Tone and Balance

The overall tone of the added content is neutral. There is one unexplained biased point in the Lead (see "Lead evaluation"). Other than that, the content added is not biased in favor of a particular point of view.

References

The user made several additions of references to different sections. They come from reliable sources. However, adding direct links would have been beneficial as references are hard to navigate.

Organization

The content is easy to read but contains a number of spelling and punctuation errors. In particular, the name of the architect is misspelled several times throughout the article, including a reference. There is a grammatical error in sentence structure in the first segment of the History section.

The organization of the article does work for its content.

Images and Media

I could not identify if any images were added.

Overall impressions

The added content mainly focused on small details, but they did expand on the major point of the content. The content might be improved by including a section with a general description of the building. Spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors should be fixed.

Adyachuk (talk) 03:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Adyachuk