User talk:Kaylaw123

Peer Review: 1) The article does a great job of describing indentured servitude in North America. There are a lot of helpful details. 2) There was a lot of information on the North American heading in comparison to the other headings. It might be easier to read if the information under the North American heading was broken up into subheadings. 3) The most important this that could be improved is readability. It is one big heading (North America) that contains the bulk of the information making it hard to read all at once. 4) I could apply this to my own article because of its relation to slavery. Jamisenrose (talk) 06:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Subs :Peer Review
I have moved your peer review to User:Kaylaw123/Subs :Peer Review, because it is not a template. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:31, 24 May 2017 (UTC)