User talk:Kaylawright23/sandbox

First off, I quite enjoyed your article. It was informative and straight to the point, especially with how you segmented the to-be article and the particular uses of links to other pages for more detail when first mentioned. A minor detail about the headings, I would personally remove the ellipses in the "See Also" section because other articles do not have them. Though if this is your calling card for the article, then I say go for it. The article was brief and is mostly, entirely, consistent in its language and tone, I wouldn't personally use words like "solidly" in the Politics, Government, & Law due to their more common approach in words. But honestly, that's a nitpick because otherwise there were none that I could find. Overall, I'd give it a once over and say good job.

Minor Readability Stuff
These are just a few recommendations to keep the text flowing well. Most of them are probably subjective, so feel free to ignore any suggestions you think are nonsense.

In the lead I might rephrase your sentence to say "Cecil County was founded in the late 1600s, and has continued to grow since then."

Since the Cecil County School of Technology doesn't have its own page, it might help to give a little summary of what it is/does (Why doesn't it fall under the other categories of schooling?)

In the section on crime rates I would recommend getting rid of the "here are" bit. Your introduction to the stats is terrific, it's just that transition feels a little un-Wikipedian.

Under the Important People section, I would maybe try to clean up some of the descriptions. --DubiousJosh (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Other Comments
Thorough research!!

Some of your references seem like they should have hyperlinks(Those same citations are fine in the actual article though so it's probably not an issue).

References go after periods (but, again, it seems like these are fine in the actual article).

It seems like your contributions are all concrete improvements on the article as it was, so, well done! --DubiousJosh (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)