User talk:Kayle Larkin

WikiProject Companies
Hey Kayle, I noticed that you were the last person to join this project before me. Which companies are you working on or interested in working on? Maybe we can collaborate on some together. - Indefensible (talk) 07:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi!, Main interest was cleaning up pages flagged as promotional and template uniformity. Happy to collaborate on some together. Where should we start? - Kayle Larkin (talk) 02:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


 * User:Kayle Larkin, that sounds productive, can you please post the Wiki links to those filters? I think there should be some priority list and it would be good to start as close to the top (i.e. the highest value edits needed) of the list that we can address and go down the list. Articles are graded based on both estimated importance and quality, but high importance articles (e.g. Microsoft) may already have a lot of attention and be of high quality, so they probably aren't near the top of the edits needed list. But there are still plenty of articles for large companies that I've noticed are lacking and could be improved, in particular I'm interested in S&P 500 companies and found one (Steris) was missing, so I started that article recently (although it still has a lot of room for improvement). Another example of a big company that has an article which could be improved a lot is Intertek in the UK's FTSE 100 Index. Please tag my username so I will hopefully see your replies. Thanks! - Indefensible (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

User:Indefensible, I am unaware of a filter. There is a grading table within Wikiproject companies and there are Business Pages Needing Attention. Otherwise, manually combining through a chosen category. The task force for privaty equity firms has not been edited since April 2019. I am still learning and slowly working through one particular article. I'm shooting for a rewrite of it mid-February. Would you like review my edits prior to publishing? I am happy to help with the one you are working on too. Goal is one per month. Kayle Larkin (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I was not aware of the WP:Pages needing attention/Business list, will take a look at that. Would be happy to review the article you're working on, but not sure it has to be before you publish. Which article is it? One thing I've noticed is that it can be surprisingly difficult to find neutral sources of information on a company, even a large / well-established one, so unfortunately I've taken more of a quantity over quality approach to just fill out details as I come across them. - Indefensible (talk) 06:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Kayle Larkin, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to FreshBooks have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Diannaa Thank you for your help! I will review the copyright sources you provided to improve my future contributions. Kayle Larkin (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carpages.ca
Hello Kayle Larkin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carpages.ca for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lapablo (talk) 20:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello Lapablo,

I have contested the speedy deletion of Carpages.ca The article was written about a notable Canadian company in accordance to the third party sources. Replacing the promotional content with content from a neutral point of view is preferable to deletion. Happy to make any edits to the page that you have found to be promotional.

May 2020
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 13:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Note that I've suppressed the function of the disclosure tags for purposes of your unblock request. 331dot (talk) 07:47, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

You're probably going to need to agree to not edit about your clients at least for a time. Perhaps once you demonstrate with your edit history that you are aware of what goes into Wikipedia articles(they aren't just for telling about the subject), you might later be permitted to make edit requests. What topics unrelated to your clients do you want to edit about? 331dot (talk) 07:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:331dot, thank you so much for considering my request. What I meant to communicate in the closing sentence was that I had read and fully understood the terms of use. I have never solicited or advertised editing services and have no intention of doing so. This truly was a novice mistake that will not happen again. To answer your question, "What topics unrelated to your clients do you want to edit about?" I had joined the Wikipedia Companies project because I thought that is where my skillset would be the most helpful. Embarrassingly, my intention was to help clean up pages flagged for promotional content and to help pages adhere to template uniformity. Above, January 07, I spoke with another new Companies Project user where I stated this as my goal. I understand if I am no longer allowed to help with the Companies Project. I did not understand that articles are for telling about more than the subject - I would like to help edit articles to adhere to template uniformity, I know my skillset will be of good use there. Is there another project you would recommend or an established editor that would have time to mentor? Kayle Larkin (talk) 03:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you participate with the companies project without editing about your clients? Mentors can be found at Adopt-a-user.331dot (talk) 07:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't think that's possible given the apparent nature of the undisclosed relationship. Put simply, I don't trust this editor to write about any attention-seeking or spam-prone subject. Technical edits and minor stuff is fine, but there's no escaping the suspicions of COI and PAID regardless of whether a client relationship exists with this one. MER-C 11:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

User:331dot - Yes, I am able to participate without editing any clients, COI or paid.

That is not and was never my intention. Transparency has been my goal which is why I use my full name and do not edit anonymously. The first thing I did was seek mentorship by adding the adoption badge to my user profile. I'm not hiding anything or trying to game the system - I was truly fascinated by a source of factual information that is so highly guarded by volunteers with a common goal.

If it is decided that I am only allowed to make technical edits and "minor stuff" that is fine. I would ask that what I am allowed to do be clearly laid out so that I do not make a mistake and get blocked again.

Orphaned non-free image File:Carpages.ca logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Carpages.ca logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Carpages.ca


Hello, Kayle Larkin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carpages.ca".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Alice Smith School in Malaysia Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Alice Smith School in Malaysia Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)