User talk:Kazak/WWII Casualties

Krivosheev
You need to read Kirosheev. The Nr you posted is wrong, get the book! berndd
 * The number is correct. See my post on Talk:World War II Casualties. Cossack 20:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Go to table nr 132- see пропало без вести незачисленных в списки войск 500K. This is addeed to the 8,686 K to come to the 9,186 K that Kirosheev cites as total war losses. Take the time to read duh whole article. Berndd
 * Your quote is out of context. The whole thing says  	Кроме того, пропало без вести по пути в части военнообязанных, призванных по мобилизации, но не зачисленных в списки войск. This means those 500K were deserters and draft-dodgers, not MIA. Cossack

The English translation is as follows " Plus reservists captured by the enemy after being conscripted but before being taken on strength". Duh issue of deserters is NOT refered to at all!! What you need to do is take your Russian-English dictionary off duh shelf & brew up some strong coffee. berndd
 * You should get your Webster's off the shelf and look up "duh". If they weren't listed in the army, they were civilians. Cossack

After Sputnik went up Ike said Americans should learn Russian, I did my homework. Berndd Correct Кроме того, пропало без вести по пути в части военнообязанных, призванных по мобилизации, но не зачисленных в списки войск Plus reservists captured by the enemy after being conscripted but before being taken on strength". Duh issue of deserters is NOT mentioned.Berndd--4.236.63.56 11:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC) So you are saying Soviet Partisans should not be counted as military? Berndd--4.236.63.56 11:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * "Пропали безвести" means "went missing", not "captured". "Captured" is "Взяты в плен". And yes, partisans were paramilitary civilians and should be counted separately. [[User:Kazak|Cossack]Duh issue of deserters is NOT mentioned.

That number of 8.7 million makes no sense, you really believe the Red Army lost 1.8 million MIA and POWs combined? Look at the data on the tables, the number for 1941 of 2.3 million POws and missing is wrong. The Germans captured 3.3 million POws in 1941. Kirosheev is sweeping Russian losses under the rug, Erlikman is closer to reality.

Soviet Losses
The Soviets recorded 6.885 K confirmed war dead. This does not include MIA(dead in battle and not recored), POW deaths and Partisan and Milita deaths. The Germans captured 5,735,000 POWs according to Clodfelter and Kirosheev reports 2,776,000 as being liberated, what happened to the other 2,959,000 ? And what were the number of MIA and combat deaths of partisans and Milita(the men defending Moscow in Nov 1941)? Today there is a card file in the former Soviet MOD that has recorded 13.6 million military WW2 era deaths. No doubt many were reservists in German occupied territory who died as "civilians" or at the hands of the NKVD after the war. Look at it this way; the Soviets lost 20.1 million men and 6.5 million women. Civilian deaths should have been 50-50 if only German bombs and execution squads were the cause of the losses. Soviet casualties and the entire planet from 1900 to 2003 are covered in - Vadim Erlikman. Poteri narodonaseleniia v XX veke : spravochnik. Moscow 2004. ISBN 5931651071. Its a great book which you can order from eastview.com Berndd So you are saying Soviet Partisans should not be counted as military? Berndd--4.236.63.56 11:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Or view it online here . --Kuban Cossack

Like I said before get the Erlikman book. I was a fan of Kirocheev before I read it. Erlikman uses Soviet and Russian sources and is not a government hack like Kirosheev, his data is far more comprehensive than anything you will see in English. Kirosheev is good for data on campaigns and battles but is weak on the big demographic picture. Also I listed two other books in the footnotes one called Ludskie Poteri and the other by Andreev on Soviet Population. Take a look at these also. Berndd
 * I looked at it. It gives the same figure: 8,600,000. CossackNO_NO WHAT DOES HE LIST ON PAGE 20? 7.6 Million KIA, 2.6 Million POW and 400,000. The 8.6 Million figure is mentioned in the footnotes as being the official figure. We need to talk about the book since you have it. I can read Russian but my writing skills are limited.Berndd

Some problems with Soviet and Russian casualty statistics
1-Partisan & Militia deaths of 400,000 are included with civilian deaths. 2 –POW losses of 1.6 million are included with civilian dead. 3- Losses of  2.3 million in western Byelorussia & Ukraine are included with Poland by western historians. The Russians include these losses with the USSR. To avoid duplication these losses need to backed out of Soviet or Polish losses. 4- To arrive at the total loss of 26.6 million the Russians assume only 450,000 persons emigrating after WW2. The actual emigration was about 1 million which means losses were overstated by about 600,000. 5-The Soviet population recorded in the 1939 census was 168.5 million not 170.5 million. Stalin ordered the number to be falsified. 6- Soviet civilian losses of about 3 million persons due to famine in the territory not occupied by the Germans are included in the total losses of 26.6 million. . 7-The Germans had 1 million Soviet deserters in their Army. 215,000 were killed in action. They need to be included with German losses 8- In addition to the war losses of 26.6 million the Russians and the PC crowd in the west tend  to ignore the 1.7 million Soviet citizens that died due to communist terror ( I realize that this is not NPOV but it is a fact that can’t be ignored) 9-Rule of thumb should be to check and analyze Soviet & Russian claims of losses. They throw a figure at you and expect it to be accepted as “ official” “ how dare you question official government data” Berndd--68.236.161.237 14:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Why not check and analyze American claims of losses? Or do you just assume that Russians are liars? CossackNo my source is Russian, Vadim Erlikman who lists 10.6 million military deaths, this includes 2.6 million POWs and 400,000 partisans & Milita. He makes sense.

The Soviets were serial liars, the Russian people never trusted the Communists. They get only 20% of the votes today, anyway comment on my points, I never said Russians are liars, they throw a Nr of 27 million at you without any explaination. You should accept it on faith no questions asked, In Russia I made sure to count my change after every purchase, I bet you do too. Berndd

Partisan Losses
¢Partisan losses are included with duh military casualties. Oh my God! we need to reclassify them as civilians.Lets start with Norway, those guys who blew up the heavy water plants were not combatants. The French Marquis who worked with MI5 on D day were not combatants. The Italian partisans who fought behind the lines in 1944-45 were not combatants. Tito’s Red Army and the Chetniks were civilians not combatants. The Greek and Bulgarian communist partisans were not combatants they were civilians. The Slovak partisans of 1944 that assisted the Red Army were not combatants. Chiang’s guerillas were civilians not combatants. Mao’s Red Army were not combatants they were civilians. The AK home Army losses in the 1944 uprising were civilians not combatants. The Soviet Partisans were civilians not military combatants. Its a fact these folks these folks did not raise their right hand and swear and oath to the motherland and did not die wearing a uniform. Put them in the same column as mom, grandpa and the kids.bernnd--68.236.161.237 15:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * They should be counted separately. Partisan formations were not part of the Red Army. CossackTrue but they were fighting the Germans and were supplied by air by the Soviets, check out the Wikipedia page on Soviet Partisans.

RUSSIAN OB 1914-1917
Do you know of a complete Russian OB for 1914-7 on line? berndd

THE MEMORY OF MILLIONS OF FALLEN DEFENDERS OF THE FATHERLAND MUST NOT BE CONSIGNED TO OBLIVION
FROM DUPUY INSTITUTE FORUM The subject of Soviet losses in WWII is a very sensitive one in Russia. The military establishement appears bent on sticking to the numbers given in Krivosheyev's 1993 book, "Security Classification Removed" which was updated in 2001 as "Losses in the Armed Forces". This book gives a total military personnel permanent loss figure of 8,668,400. Others researchers give higher figures, sometimes fantastically higher. The issue of losses is intimately connected with the issue of the Red Army's performance during WWII, particuarly the performance of Zhukov. Here is a short article which appeared about 18 months ago in Russia. If you are interested in receiving the chart which accompanies the article, tell me.

THE MEMORY OF MILLIONS OF FALLEN DEFENDERS OF THE FATHERLAND MUST NOT BE CONSIGNED TO OBLIVION As the deputy chief editor of this journal I am constantly aware of the polemics which carry on in these pages on the subject of permanent [bezvozratnyy] losses of the Soviet Armed Forces during the Great Patriotic War. Having served more than thirteen years in the Central Archives of the Defense Ministry of the Russian Federation [TsAMO], three of them as chief of the Department for Registering Permanent Losses among Sergeants and Privates, I know the true situation in this area very well. For some time I have been forced to observe in silence the bitter arguments between my comrades and their opponents. I justified this to myself because on-going research in the archives was not yet finished. But these arguments have reached a culmination, and the work at TsAMO to the count the losses still has several years yet to go, so I no longer have the right to remain silent. Therefore, following my conscience, as an officer and the grandson of a man who, on 17 November 1941, as a tank mechanic-driver in the 26th Tank Brigade, died defending Moscow, I think it my civil duty to publish this article. The older generation will well remember that for several decades after the war personnel losses in the Soviet Union were officially given as 20 million persons (this number includes military and civilian losses). With the declassification of many archives in the 90’s, this number grew to 27 million. Then, for the first time, the losses of the Armed Forces of the USSR were publicized. In an interview in March 1990 with the editor of the Journal of Military History [Voenno-istoricheskiy zhurnal, No. 3, 1990, page 14], the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the USSR, General of the Army M. A. Moiseyev, stated that during the Great Patriotic War (including the campaign in the Far East against imperialist Japan in 1945) the number of military personnel killed, missing, captured but not returned, died from wounds, sickness, and accident, numbered 8,668,400, of them 8,509,300 in the Army and Fleet, 97,700 in the internal troops, and 61,400 in the border guards. These numbers mentioned by the Chief of the General Staff, were determined by a commission which worked in 1988-1989 with the reports of Fronts, Fleets, Separate Armies, rear services organizations, and checked against the count kept by the General Staff in the entire war. This same number was given in a large investigation of personnel losses in the Great Patriotic War “Security Classification Removed” [Grif Sekretnosti Snyat] which came out in 1993 under the general editorship of G. F. Krivosheyev, Candidate of Military Science, General-Colonel (retired). In the present article I would like to talk about another source which contains information about losses in the Armed Forces of the USSR during the war – about documents which are preserved in TsAMO. On July 9, 1941, within the Chief Directorate for Forming and Outfitting the Red Army (GUFKKA) was formed a Department for Registration of Personnel Losses and Bureau of Letters. The department’s assignment was to keep a register of personnel losses in the Armed Forces, to maintain an alphabetical card file of losses, and to conduct scientific research related to this. On February 5, 1943 the department became the Central Bureau for Registration of Personnel Losses in the Active Armies, still under the GUGKKA, and on April 19, 1943, it became the Directorate for Registration of Personnel Losses in the Active Armies. It consisted of eight departments: Registration-Statistical, Card File, Letters with Loss Information, Inquiries about Servicemen, Letters with Information for the Card File, Special Projects [prikaznyy], Inspection, and Miscellaneous. Because the responsibility for registering losses among officers was transferred to the personnel agencies of the People’s Commissariat for Defense in June 12, 1943, the Directorate was renamed as the Directorate for Registration of Personnel Losses Among Junior Commanders and Privates of the Red Army, and was put under the head of the Chief Directorate for Rear Services of the Red Army. As of March 26, 1946 the Directorate was subordinated to the Chief Staff of the Land Forces, and after the elimination of this Chief Staff, was turned into the Department for Registration of Killed and Missing Privates and Sergeants as part of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the USSR. On December 30, 1965, the Department was put under the Archives of the Ministry of Defense of the USSR (now TsAMO). The Department preserves reports from active armies dating from the first days of the war concerning servicemen who were killed, missing, died from wounds and other reasons in large and small units as well as various military institutions. At the same time, information about servicemen who died of wounds or illnesses in hospitals or for other reasons came in from districts in the rear. It must be clarified that, due to the difficult situation at the front, a full accounting of losses was not always possible, especially in the first years of the war. In such cases it was done not by name, but by overall totals. In order to identify the persons in such reports, starting in 1942 a registration was begun on the basis of reports from relatives of servicemen. There were instances when military units could not conduct burials or include in loss reports permanent losses of dead privates and sergeants. Burial was carried out by the local population after liberation from the fascists, and the territorial military commissariats drew up lists of those interred based on personal documents of the deceased and soldiers’ medallions [a type of dog tag]. Immediately after the war and by 1949 the military commissariats conducted the so-called “canvass of yards” where they went to people’s yards and homes with lists of questions for relatives of frontline soldiers who did not return from the war, with the aim of identifying the missing. Such servicemen make up 60% of the card file. Lists and cards captured in 1944 which identify servicemen who died in captivity and other captured documents received in 1947-48 helped determine the fate of many. All of the documents listed above make up the collection of more than 32,000 archival files at the Department for Registering Permanent Losses among Sergeants and Privates at TsAMO. On the basis of these, alphabetical cards for each serviceman – killed, died, missing, suicides, etc. - have been created with biographical information. Now in an alphabetical card file, they are the basic informational tool both for answering inquiries and for scientific research. Additions to the card file as well as systemization and clarification of the information continue to this day. The last addition to the collection was made in 1993, when around 11,000 files with lists of servicemen who died from wounds in hospitals, medical battalions, and other treatment institutions were received from the archives of the Military Medical Museum in St. Petersburg. This resulted in a massive increase to the card file. Many servicemen who were counted as missing were re-categorized as died in hospitals and medical battalions after reviewing these files. For some servicemen there are several cards. On one he is listed as missing, on another as died, etc. These cards are stapled together and counted as one person. In the beginning of the 90’s a group was formed to update the card file of permanent losses and to prepare statistical data based on it. The members of this group scrupulously counted the cards by the first letter of the last name and category of loss. The count was divided into the following categories: 1. killed – from reports of military units 2. killed – from reports of military commissariats 3. missing – from reports of military units 4. missing – from reports of military commissariats 5. died in German captivity 6. died of illness 7. died of wounds – from reports of military units 8. died of wounds – from reports of military commissariats Counts were also made of deserters, servicemen sentenced to correctional labor institutions, servicemen sentenced to death, servicemen removed from the count of permanent losses (i.e. turned out to be alive), servicemen suspected of collaborating with the Germans, and servicemen who were captured but survived. As of November 1, 2000, last names starting with 20 letters of the alphabet were finished. These charts do not include counts of deserters, those convicted or executed, etc. They only include information from the eight categories listed above. Preliminary counts have been made for the remaining six letters of the alphabet (B, L, S, T, Ch, Ya). They could change by 30-40,000 persons plus or minus after the work on the card file is completed (see chart). From the 20 letters which have been counted, 116,513 person were removed from the total of permanent losses because they turned out to be alive according to reports from military commissariats. Of the remaining uncounted letters, it is reasonable to assume that there will be 30-40,000 more such people. The end result will be a number of around 150,000 persons who, according to reports from military units and military commissariats, were mistakenly counted as permanent losses, but who later turned out to be alive. They make up approximately 1.2% of the card file. The movement and losses of officers of the Red Army was controlled by the Chief Personnel Directorate of the People’s Commissariat for Defense, which also created an alphabetical card file of permanent losses based on lists and reports. This card file is also preserved at TsAMO, and one cannot but agree that these two card files contain the most exact and complete information on personnel losses in the Great Patriotic War, because behind every report which caused a card to be written, at one time stood a live person, not an empty statistic. At the present time the losses among officers with last names beginning with the letter “A” to the letter “O” have been counted. A preliminary count has been made for the rest of the letters (see chart). A preliminary count of permanent losses of officers with last names beginning with the letters “P” through “Ya”, subtracting those sentenced to prison or execution, deserters, or who were alive, is around 350,000 persons. Therefore, officer losses in the Great Patriotic War (killed, missing, died of wounds, illness, or in captivity) is around 1,100,000 persons. Adding up all losses in the Armed Forces of the USSR in the Great Patriotic War, we have: - losses of privates and sergeants in the Red Army, approximately 12,434,398; - losses of officers in the Red Army, approximately 1,100,000; - losses of naval personnel (officers and sailors) according to the Central Naval Archives in Gatchina, Leningradskaya Oblast, 154,771 (according to the book “Security Classification Removed”, page 133); - losses in internal troops (NKVD), 97,700 (according to the book “Security Classification Removed”, page 129); - losses in border troops 61,400 (according to the book “Security Classification Removed”, page 129). We end up with a number for permanent losses of our Armed Forces in the Great Patriotic War of around 13,850,000 persons.

About the author Sergey Aleksandrovich Il’enkov – Graduated from the Kalinnin Suvorov Military Academy, the Higher Military Academy, the Moscow State Historical-Archival Institute. Assistant chief for scientific work of the Central Archives of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Co author of many scientific works on the history of the Great Patriotic War. Voennno-Istoricheskiy Arkhiv No. 7(22), 2001, pp. 73-80

Update on Sergey Aleksandrovich Il’enkov
Sergey Aleksandrovich Il’enkov the author of the 2001 article I posted is toady head of the Central Russian Military Archive. Berrndd