User talk:Kazimkazim08

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from VfL Wolfsburg. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Mehmet Güven has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Happysailor (Talk) 21:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Manchester City F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Empty Buffer (talk) 09:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Could you explain your edit to this? I'm curious as I don't understand what it is you've tried to achieve. Thanks. gonads 3  13:41, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Would you like to discuss this? Thanks. gonads 3  22:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Fenerbahce
Hi. The kit images that you keep re-adding to the Fenerbahçe S.K. infobox have a couple of problems. Firstly, the adidas logos are included, which is a potential breach of copyright, something which Wikipedia has to strenuously try and avoid. Secondly, these logos are overdetailed, making the image cluttered - note that Template:Football kit states "the template is for showing basic team colours. It is not supposed to be an accurate drawing of the kit." Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If you are not willing to discuss the matter here, perhaps you would like to do so at Talk:Fenerbahçe_S.K.? Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Why are you refusing to engage in discussion? Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 18:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Seriously, why do you keep re-introducing these copyright infringements and refuse to engage in a discussion about it? It's very poor manners. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 08:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Robinho. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Barret (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Fenerbahçe S.K.. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 08:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zvjezdan Misimović, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 14:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please, please, please leave edit summaries when you change articles. Accurate summaries help other contributors decide whether it is worthwhile for them to review an edit, and to understand the change should they choose to review it. When a major edit (e.g. deletion of a substantial amount of text) doesn't have an edit summary, there are fewer reasons to assume good faith and busy editors may be more inclined to revert the change without checking it in detail. There are standard templates for warning editors who delete content without providing an edit summary: delete1 (which assumes good faith) and delete2 (which doesn't). Thanks - Pointillist (talk) 21:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ertuğrul Sağlam has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Uhai (talk &middot; contribs) 15:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)