User talk:Kb147206DHI

Objection to deletion:

I am writing to inquire about the specific reasons as to why my article is being proposed for deletion. I understand if the article needs more sources; however, while the company is locally notable, it has also been recognized on a national and global scale.

By no means have I had any intention to glorify the company, nor have I any intention to sell products. This article was solely written to present a company which may potentially be the future of medical diagnosis.

Furthermore, one of the company's competitors, Millipore, has a Wikipedia article that almost mirrors that of Diagnostic Hybrid's tentative article.

Any feedback that would improve this article would be appreciated.

Kb147206DHI (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:LogowRThemePantone.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LogowRThemePantone.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  20:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc. constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Catgut (talk) 20:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)