User talk:Kblackwa

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Xcelience, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- azumanga (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Template:Db-g11 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 17:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Xcelience constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 17:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Can you please explain what we have done to constitute vandalism? We have added several internal Wikilinks to the page to help users better understand the technical terms of the page. We also inserted about 6 relevant and credible 3rd party articles to the "External Links" section of the page, but these were immediately removed. Are the under review or is there another issue with the articles that we need to be aware of? Kblackwa (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xcelience


A tag has been placed on Xcelience requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)