User talk:Kbpark1999

Welcome!
Hello, Kbpark1999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! &mdash; Dsimic (talk | contribs) 06:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Row hammer article
Hello! Regarding of a reference to the Row hammer article, please note that http://users.ece.gatech.edu/~pnair6/rowhammer/rowhammer.pdf isn't the same paper as what's described on http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?arnumber=7049516. As I've noted in, if we could get a complete paper then it would fit well as a reference, otherwise it fits well. &mdash; Dsimic (talk | contribs) 06:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * As I've noted in my another, please don't remove the link to a complete paper, simply because it's much more usable than IEEE's brief summary. Hope you agree. &mdash; Dsimic (talk &#124; contribs) 09:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I assume this editor is the first author of the paper in question. His insistence on the removal of the current link may have something to do with IEEE's republication policies (I'm not very familiar with those, so I'm not sure if they allow or forbid republication on the author's homepage.) The fact that paper is now gone there and only available via the Wayback Machine suggest the latter. I would at least link to IEEE's paywall via a DOI, as this is the "official" place to get the "final version" of the paper in question. Normally I'd also always link to the author's version, but since it is now gone this may be somewhat dodgy legally... You could try adding both a DOI link to IEEE and a "(preprint)" link to the Wayback Machine and see if it sticks. —Ruud 12:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for commenting here, . I understand your concerns, which are totally reasonable, but it's quite hard to figure out what are 's real intentions when an  is all that's available.  Let's wait for a reply from Kbpark1999, if you agree. &mdash; Dsimic (talk &#124; contribs) 12:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Dsimic, First of all, I appreciate for your help. I confused the publication policy of IEEE publisher. Since this paper should not be opened without IEEE's paywall, we removed the link of the complete paper. Instead I modified the current post from the IEEE's brief summary to the DOI as your recommendation. I appreciate for your consideration.—Kbpark1999 (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok, we no longer have the full-article PDF version as part of the reference, so it should be fine from the standpoint of IEEE's publishing policy. It creates a paywall, though, but that's what it is. &mdash; Dsimic (talk &#124; contribs) 04:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)