User talk:Kcmurphy88

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Los Angeles, California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Los Angeles, California was changed by Kcmurphy88 (c) (t) deleting 76616 characters on 2007-12-20T17:55:45+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit to U.S. v. Cruikshank
Hi,

I noticed that a recent edit you made to U.S. v. Cruikshank had a factual error and corrected it. There were actually only five Justices in the majority (Waite, Swayne, Miller, Field, Strong), and four in the dissent. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that "the lone dissenter was a Democrat", although "the lone Democrat was a dissenter" is correct. Thank you, --131.215.220.161 (talk) 06:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Jenny McCarthy.
Your comment brings up two points.
 * 1) I didn't use WP:BLP as my reason for removing the link. I used WP:LINKFARM for my justification.
 * 2) The controversy that you refer to is not the only reason why she's notable. She was notable enough for an article long before 2002.  Dismas |(talk) 23:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I took a look at the article history and see now that someone else reverted your edit at the same minute that I did. I wasn't even aware of them doing that and I'm not really sure why my edit even shows up in the article history.  After all, I didn't change anything according to that.  Dismas |(talk) 01:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)