User talk:Kcron24

Speedy deletion nomination of Cronin Economics
Hello Kcron24,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cronin Economics for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Rushbugled13 (talk) 03:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 03:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cronin Economics


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cronin Economics, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rushbugled13 (talk) 03:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cronin Economics


The article Cronin Economics has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⁓ Hello  71  03:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Cronin Economics for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cronin Economics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cronin Economics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Monty 845  03:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Rushbugled13 (talk) 03:50, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm confused where did I attack, threaten, or disparage? Can you please highlight so I can delete if I did.

Kevin
 * While your article does violate other policies, WP:NOTESSAY and WP:NOTOPINION, I can't figure out what he is talking about with that notice either. I have already declined one of his CSD taggings, so I will leave it to another set of eyes to handle this one, but I think it is unfounded. Monty  845  04:00, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The subject of this article mainly deals with disparaging the Federal Reserve, based upon personal opinion, and not any sources. Even if this article had reliable sources to back up the negative claims about the Federal Reserve, Wikipedia articles must be neutral and must not attack subjects. Rushbugled13 (talk) 04:04, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure generalized criticisms of government entities are beyond the scope of G10, which is primarily used to deal with attacks against individuals. Monty  845  04:07, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

It's an alternative to the Federal Reserve. Instead of a central private bank, I'm dissolving it into government district banks. I guess in a sense it's shows the Federal Reserve in a negative light but I use figures and mathematical equations to back up my claims. I understand that I may need to add more references but as I stated before it's still a work in progress. I appreciate your comments and I will take them into consideration. It's kind of funny that you think I'm attacking, threatening, or disparaging the Federal Reserve in anyway. If you read the whole essay it's extremely peaceful. I even mention that the Federal Reserve should be dissolved through a peaceful diplomatic process. The Federal Reserve was a great way to handle our economic system in the past but it now only makes the economy unstable. I show this in my paper if you read it. It would be nice if I could upload pictures so I could show you my math. Thanks again, Kevin

Status and Advice
It's not a speedy deletion under any of the criteria, so I and another admin agree it cannot be so deleted. However, it is absolutely not a possible Wikipedia article. WP is not a place to publish your original theories, no matter how good they are. There's no point adding references that support your original ideas--original ideas still don't belong here. Rather, you should publish them in some reliable standard way, and if the public takes note of them, others will write about them, and someone else will make an article here, using those articles about your theory as the third party sources. Even after you publish them elsewhere, you yourself should not make an article about your work -- see WP:COI.

Really, this is just plain not the place--it will inevitably be deleted within a week, and if you understand you really should facilitate matters by placing at the top a line reading : , and it will be quickly deleted. & you can avoid any further negative comment.

I did however delete the AfC page--once you put the article in mainspace it's entirely redundant.

If I can help you further, let me know on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 06:08, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

I understand Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Cronin Economics


A tag has been placed on Cronin Economics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mediran talk to me! 01:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cronin Economics


A tag has been placed on Cronin Economics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler ) 02:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cronin Economics, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler ) 02:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Please be aware
That you are risking a block for disruption if you keep this up. Your recreation of Cronin Economics is really pushing the limits. If you want to have an impact on Wikipedia, you will need to persuade others to support your contributions, so they are not deleted. Consider asking for advice. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:25, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

This message should be deleted due to the fact that this is someone's opinion not based on any facts or evidence.

"Delete— terrible article, but it doesn't merit a speedy delete. An article that "serves no purpose other than to promote its creator's POV" has another name on Wikipedia: WP:NPOV. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 00:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)"

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia coverage of Cronin Economics Timeline


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia coverage of Cronin Economics Timeline, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - MrX 17:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

This is simply a timeline or history of another wikipedia page that is being published. How is this against any of the wikipedia terms or policies?

-Kevin

December 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 18:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Why was I blocked?

Must be a a good reason if you can't answer. I guess your argument is too good to even say.

I always thought Wikipedia was an open source. I guess I was wrong it has just as much censorship as anywhere else :(.
 * From the number of warnings you were given above, the reason you were blocked should be pretty self-evident. It has nothing to do with censorship; reread everything if you don't get it.  The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 18:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Let me get this straight, your response is 'it's way too easy to explain so I'm not even going to mention it'. Thanks for being so helpful!
 * I'll try and explain this to be completely clear; be advised that if you continue to refuse to get the message that will be seen as further justification for your block. You repeatedly recreated an article about a non-notable company, and refused to heed anyone's warning.  When you finally responded, it was in an obviously unhelpful way, and combined with the previous warnings it was very obvious that you had no intention of stopping.  To be unblocked, you will need to agree not to recreate the article again.  Do you understand? The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 19:01, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * From the above post, Kcron, I'm assuming that The Blade of the Northern Lights hasn't read the original article, though that doesn't mean he was at all in the wrong to block you. More precisely, you repeatedly created an article about your personal economic theory, despite having been made aware of our policies against this, and signaling that you understood said policies.  Furthermore, you used two sockpuppets to blank the already-finished Articles for Deletion entry on your article  .  If you actually want to be unblocked, in my estimation you'd have to read the following policies - WP:OR, WP:N, WP:V, WP:SOCK, WP:CSD, WP:BLANK, and probably WP:CIV for good measure - and demonstrate to an administrator that you fully understand them, and will not violate them again.  You might also want to read the essays WP:RECREATE and WP:OUTLET.  Yes, that's a lot of reading material, but, frankly, you've broken a lot of rules. — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie  (Je vous invite à me parler ) 19:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Blade: Or am I mistaken, and was there something promotional in there? I just realized that I don't have a clear enough recollection of the article to assert so definitively that you haven't read it. — Francophonie&#38;Androphilie  (Je vous invite à me parler ) 19:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcron24 (talk • contribs) 19:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Can you please take down Hasirpad's comment about my article. He is disparaging my article without providing any evidence or facts to support his claims.

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 22:12, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cronin Economics


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cronin Economics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rushbugled13 (talk) 22:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)