User talk:Kcschlack

Welcome!

Hello, Kcschlack, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lean engineering, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AndieM ''  (Leave a message!)  20:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Lean engineering


A tag has been placed on Lean engineering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AndieM ''  (Leave a message!)  20:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Lean engineering
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lean engineering, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.leanengineering.com/. As a copyright violation, Lean engineering appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lean engineering has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lean engineering and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Lean engineering with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lean engineering.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Kcschlack/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Kcschlack/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Lean Engineering
My first reservation about this was that it seemed to be your proprietary term, in which case it would not be a suitable subject because of the WP:No original research policy, which includes "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a discovery." It's true that suggests that the term is in wider use, but is it clearly enough defined - is there general enough agreement on its scope?

Next question: is this different enough from Lean manufacturing, where there is already an article? WP:Content forking is discouraged unless there is a real distinction. I see that your text does touch on this distinction, but I am not clear on it.

You wrote "My intention is to remove the content on www.leanengineering.com and move it to Wikipedia." I'm not sure just what you mean, but if you are thinking of Wikipedia being a web-host or forum, that is not an encyclopedia's role. The text on your website reads as though it is partly promoting the idea, and partly providing a step-by-step how-to guide in a chatty, first-person style. Neither of those is the role of an encyclopedia article: (a) Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view, and (b) among the long list of things that WP:Wikipedia is not is Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook or textbook.

If you are commercially interested in Lean Manufacturing, you would have from WP's point of view a WP:Conflict of interest - that is not an insurmountable obstacle, but it would need to be declared and you would need to be careful. Wikipedia is extremely resistant to being used for any kind of promotion.

In summary, I think there is scope for an article on this subject, but it would not look like the text of your web-site.

I suggest that you post a note - or if you like, I will - on the talk page of WP:WikiProject Engineering, a group of editors interested in engineering, to see if others are interested. ("Editor" means just the same as "user" - there is no separate class of "editors".)

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)