User talk:Kdawgg11361

Dudebitch
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dudebitch, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dudebitch fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dudebitch, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Dudebitch itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Dudebitch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Avoid neologisms

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gilliam 00:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC) P.S.  Here is the specific policy in question: WP:NEO. - Gilliam 00:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Dudebitch
A "" template has been added to the article Dudebitch, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black Falcon (Talk) 02:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Christmas Album (That's Incentive album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 02:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Go Fly A Kite
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Georgette2 (talk) 02:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Georgette2 (talk) 02:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you the musician whose albums are the subjects of these articles? If so, you might want to take a look at WP:MUSIC and WP:COI. -- Kinu t /c  02:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's Incentive
The articles That's Incentive, Projections, Go Fly A Kite and The Christmas Album (That's Incentive album) have been deleted according to speedy deletion criterion G4 as substantial recreations by any title of articles that have been deleted following deletion discussion, where the new articles do not address the concerns that led to the consensus to delete. If you believe the closure of the original discussion, located at Articles for deletion/That's Incentive, was unjustified per policy, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the articles unless you are able to address the concerns for which they were deleted, specifically by demonstrating that the performer in question meets the notability guidelines set out at WP:MUSIC with the verification of reliable sources. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 03:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)