User talk:Kdrost09/sandbox

Hello Erhall (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Some more information on why they were protecting the medical profession by outlawing abortion would be nice :) AHughes08 (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

winona2012 Looks like you have a lot of good information! good start! The statistics provided are very interesting.

Cbrignull07 I'm excited to read your study! It looks like you have some good sources and that you're off to a strong start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdrost09 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

You have a really good start! (Swpols410 (talk) 23:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC))

Good information. You paper will definitely be an interesting read. I feel you have a good start, but make sure to mention some of the sources you plan on reviewing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ytfig11 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Interesting topic. I suggest citing your sources of the facts stated in the first paragraph about Connecticut to help strengthen your literature review. Overall, good start! It will be interesting to see the additional sources you add to strengthen your topic! --Cstene07 (talk) 08:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

You are off to a great start and I like your topis, it is very interesting and I cannot wait to read more about it. Make sure you cite your sources to make your paper credible. Also posssibly provide more sources from which you are making your agruement? Keep up the good work BBurns08 (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)BBurns08

Hey Kristine. Looks like you've got a handle on a taboo topic. Your facts are nicely laid out. I would expand with more viewpoints. Wjansen08 (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

You have a good start to your literature review but there are a few things that you should add such as a introduction to you topic, cite your sources and add some type of formating to your review. Jjdick3978 —Preceding undated comment added 20:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC).

Good start to your lit review, should be an interesting read. --Sjmiller6748 (talk) 03:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

unsigned comment added by Sjmiller6748 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Good start...as BBurns08 stated, cite your sources for credibility. Maintaining a neutral point of view can be challenging for a number of reasons, so reflect on your writing frequently ---the goal of the review of literature is to share the research presented to lead into your project. Erhall (talk) 04:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC)