User talk:KeFlBuSc

September 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Bank of America, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Dharmalion76 (talk) 23:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

I am confused how this is original research when I am linking to a federal government website referring to the information stated in the article?


 * The government website makes no mention of "tax havens". Also the fact that that have incorporated in one single country and ignoring all the other countries they are incorporated in is undue weight. Your edits are not neutral. Dharmalion76 (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Respectfully, the undue weight Wikipedia page references placing more weight on one opinion than on other opinions. I am not doing that. I have chosen a subsidiary from a list provided by the company, and included it on the page.KeFlBuSc (talk) 02:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

So if I referenced a reliable source that the Cayman Islands is a tax haven then it would be okay?KeFlBuSc (talk) 02:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * That would be WP:SYNTH. You would be using multiple sources to draw one conclusion not stated in any one source. Dharmalion76 (talk) 23:50, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry. I am looking at this, and looking at the SYNTH rules, I think I am OK. I am not drawing one conclusion. I did not make one statement backed up by two sources.  I made two statements, each backed up by a source.  The company does have a subsidiary in country X.  The company itself discloses this in the 10-K.  That country is a tax haven. The Wikipedia article on tax havens says so. I could see a technical problem had I written "Company X has a tax haven subsidiary", but that is not what I wrote. Can you please help me understand where I am going wrong? Respectfully, I believe I am following the editing guidelines. Would you prefer I used a period instead of a comma, making the separation more clear? KeFlBuSc (talk) 02:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

WP:SOCK
Are you also using Tatewftrp to make identical edits? Creating new accounts to avoid detection or sanctions can lead to being blocked. Dharmalion76 (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I am not using two accounts to avoid detection or sanctions. Is there a way I can merge the two accounts?  I will no longer be using this one, but am happy to have the two accounts seen as one. Is there a way to do that?KeFlBuSc (talk) 01:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I have added to my userpage that I will now be using tatewftrp as my username to the user page for KeFLBuSc, making clear we are one person.Tatewftrp (talk) 13:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)